Reynolds Brice S, Boudet Karine G, Faucher Mathieu R, Germain Claude, Geffre Anne, Lefebvre Herve P
Department of Clinical Sciences, National Veterinary School of Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, BP 87164, 31076 Toulouse cedex 03, France.
J Feline Med Surg. 2007 Oct;9(5):382-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 May 10.
Using paediatric devices to collect venous blood from a cephalic vein in cats offers numerous practical advantages over traditional jugular venepuncture and vacuum closed systems: minimal restraint is required; there is minimal risk of serious injury to the cat; the discomfort associated with venepuncture is reduced by the use of small diameter (25 gauge) needles; very small volumes (200 microl) of blood are extracted; and the risk of vein collapse or haematoma is low. The aim of this study was to compare the haematological and plasma chemistry results obtained from six healthy cats using the two sampling techniques. Five plasma biochemical analytes were measured and a complete haematological examination was performed on each specimen. No clinically relevant difference between the two blood sampling techniques was observed for any variable, indicating that paediatric devices provide a useful alternative to vacuum tubes for venous blood collection in the cat.
与传统的颈静脉穿刺和真空封闭系统相比，使用儿科设备从猫的头静脉采集静脉血具有许多实际优势：所需约束最小；猫受到严重伤害的风险最小；使用小直径（25号）针头可减少与静脉穿刺相关的不适；抽取的血量非常少（200微升）；静脉塌陷或血肿的风险很低。本研究的目的是比较使用这两种采样技术从六只健康猫身上获得的血液学和血浆化学结果。对每个样本测量了五种血浆生化分析物，并进行了完整的血液学检查。对于任何变量，两种采血技术之间均未观察到临床相关差异，这表明儿科设备为猫静脉采血提供了一种有用的替代真空管的方法。
