Suppr超能文献

[我们还能使用蒂埃里刮匙进行器械旋转吗?初产妇的初步研究]

[Can we still perform instrumental rotations using Thierry's spatula? Preliminary study among primiparous].

作者信息

Parant O, Simon C, Capdet J, Tanguy Le Gac Y, Reme J-M

机构信息

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Paule-de-Viguier, 330, avenue de Grande-Bretagne, TSA 70034, 31059 Toulouse cedex 09, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007 Oct;36(6):582-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study immediate perineal and neonatal outcomes after instrumental rotational performed with Thierry's spatula among primiparous, and compare subsequent perineal tear with occiput posterior position delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed from December 2005 to June 2006 at Paule-de-Viguier hospital (Toulouse university hospital) including all persistent occiput posterior vaginal deliveries among primiparous (49 patients). Mode of delivery was: 1) seven patients with spontaneous occiput anterior vaginal delivery (14.3%); 2) seven patients with rotational extraction using spatula with occiput anterior delivery (30.6%); 3) twenty-seven patients with instrumental extraction and occiput posterior delivery (55.1%). Maternal and fetal parameters were studied prospectively.

RESULTS

Spatula was performed for failure of progress in 71.4% of cases (n=30) and for no reassuring fetal status in 28.6% of cases (n=12). In "rotational group", only one perineal tear was observed (Third degree) (6.6%) versus seven in "occiput posterior extraction group" (26%) with three severe perineal lacerations. Neonatal superficial lesions are frequent (26,6% after rotation versus 11.6% after occiput posterior extraction). None severe traumatic tears were observed.

CONCLUSION

Instrumental rotation using Thierry's spatula seems to be less deleterious for maternal perineum than occiput posterior extraction, without increasing neonatal complications. Theses preliminary results have to be confirmed by more important prospective works.

摘要

目的

研究初产妇使用蒂埃里产钳进行器械旋转后的即刻会阴及新生儿结局,并将其与枕后位分娩后的会阴撕裂情况进行比较。

材料与方法

该研究于2005年12月至2006年6月在保罗 - 德 - 维吉耶医院(图卢兹大学医院)进行,纳入了所有初产妇持续性枕后位阴道分娩的病例(49例患者)。分娩方式为:1)7例自然枕前位阴道分娩(14.3%);2)7例使用产钳旋转牵引且枕前位分娩(30.6%);3)27例器械助产且枕后位分娩(55.1%)。对母婴参数进行前瞻性研究。

结果

71.4%(n = 30)的病例使用产钳是因为产程进展受阻,28.6%(n = 12)的病例是因为胎儿状况不佳。在“旋转组”,仅观察到1例会阴撕裂(三度)(6.6%),而“枕后位牵引组”有7例(26%),其中3例为严重会阴裂伤。新生儿表浅损伤很常见(旋转后为26.6%,枕后位牵引后为11.6%)。未观察到严重创伤性撕裂。

结论

使用蒂埃里产钳进行器械旋转对产妇会阴的损害似乎小于枕后位牵引,且不会增加新生儿并发症。这些初步结果有待更重要的前瞻性研究证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验