• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在检测误差时用于病例识别的分组检测算法比较。

Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error.

作者信息

Kim Hae-Young, Hudgens Michael G, Dreyfuss Jonathan M, Westreich Daniel J, Pilcher Christopher D

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3107-E McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1152-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00817.x. Epub 2007 May 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00817.x
PMID:17501946
Abstract

We derive and compare the operating characteristics of hierarchical and square array-based testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of testing error. The operating characteristics investigated include efficiency (i.e., expected number of tests per specimen) and error rates (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, per-family error rate, and per-comparison error rate). The methodology is illustrated by comparing different pooling algorithms for the detection of individuals recently infected with HIV in North Carolina and Malawi.

摘要

我们推导并比较了在存在检测误差的情况下用于病例识别的分层和基于方阵的检测算法的操作特性。所研究的操作特性包括效率(即每个样本的预期检测次数)和错误率(即灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、家族错误率和每次比较错误率)。通过比较北卡罗来纳州和马拉维用于检测近期感染艾滋病毒个体的不同混合算法来说明该方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error.存在检测误差时用于病例识别的分组检测算法比较。
Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1152-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00817.x. Epub 2007 May 14.
2
Three-dimensional array-based group testing algorithms.基于三维阵列的分组测试算法。
Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):903-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01158.x. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification.读者反应:关于在存在错误分类情况下评估分组测试算法的一则注释。
Biometrics. 2016 Mar;72(1):299-302. doi: 10.1111/biom.12385. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
4
Rejoinder to "Reader reaction: A note on the evaluation of group testing algorithms in the presence of misclassification".对《读者反馈:关于存在错误分类时群组检测算法评估的一则注释》的回应
Biometrics. 2016 Mar;72(1):304. doi: 10.1111/biom.12387. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Improved matrix pooling.改进的矩阵池化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):211-222. doi: 10.1177/0962280217719914. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Optimizing screening for acute human immunodeficiency virus infection with pooled nucleic acid amplification tests.利用混合核酸扩增试验优化急性人类免疫缺陷病毒感染的筛查
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1785-92. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00787-07. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
7
A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.一种用于采用双重检测方案的患病率调查的样本量确定的通用方法。
Biom J. 2007 Aug;49(5):694-706. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710365.
8
The significance of repeat testing in Turkish blood donors screened with HBV, HCV and HIV immunoassays and the importance of S/CO ratios in the interpretation of HCV/HIV screening test results and as a determinant for further confirmatory testing.在采用乙肝病毒(HBV)、丙肝病毒(HCV)和艾滋病毒(HIV)免疫测定法进行筛查的土耳其献血者中重复检测的意义,以及S/CO比值在丙肝病毒/艾滋病毒筛查检测结果解读中以及作为进一步确证检测决定因素的重要性。
Transfus Med. 2010 Jun;20(3):152-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2009.00987.x. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
9
HIV testing in India.印度的艾滋病毒检测
Clin Lab Med. 2012 Jun;32(2):175-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2012.04.014.
10
Sexually transmitted disease risk assessment used among low-risk populations in east central Africa: a review.东中非低风险人群中使用的性传播疾病风险评估:一项综述
East Afr Med J. 1997 Dec;74(12):764-71.

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed-effects Bayesian regression model for multivariate group testing data.用于多变量分组测试数据的混合效应贝叶斯回归模型。
Biometrics. 2025 Jan 7;81(1). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf028.
2
Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Group Testing Data.用于分组测试数据的贝叶斯加法回归树
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70052. doi: 10.1002/sim.70052.
3
Regression analysis of group-tested current status data.成组检测现状数据的回归分析
Biometrika. 2024 Feb 12;111(3):1047-1061. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asae006. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
binGroup2: Statistical Tools for Infection Identification via Group Testing.binGroup2:通过分组测试进行感染识别的统计工具。
R J. 2023 Dec;15(4):21-36. doi: 10.32614/rj-2023-081. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
5
Semi-quantitative group testing for efficient and accurate qPCR screening of pathogens with a wide range of loads.半定量分组检测技术用于高通量、高负载的病原体 qPCR 筛查的高效与精确性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 May 17;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05798-3.
6
Screening multi-dimensional heterogeneous populations for infectious diseases under scarce testing resources, with application to COVID-19.在检测资源稀缺的情况下对多维度异质人群进行传染病筛查,并应用于新冠肺炎。
Nav Res Logist. 2022 Feb;69(1):3-20. doi: 10.1002/nav.21985. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
7
Seasonal Patterns in the Frequency of Liberibacter Asiaticus in Populations of (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida.佛罗里达州柑橘木虱(半翅目:木虱科)种群中亚洲韧皮杆菌频率的季节性模式。
Insects. 2023 Sep 11;14(9):756. doi: 10.3390/insects14090756.
8
Statistical modeling and evaluation of the impact of multiplicity classification thresholds on the COVID-19 pool testing accuracy.多重分类阈值对 COVID-19 混合检测准确性影响的统计建模与评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0283874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283874. eCollection 2023.
9
Estimating the prevalence of two or more diseases using outcomes from multiplex group testing.使用多重组检测结果估计两种或多种疾病的患病率。
Biom J. 2023 Oct;65(7):e2200270. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200270. Epub 2023 May 16.
10
Effective matrix designs for COVID-19 group testing.用于 COVID-19 群体检测的有效矩阵设计。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Jan 24;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05145-y.