Galvin James E, Roe Catherine M, Coats Mary A, Morris John C
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2007 May;64(5):725-30. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.5.725.
To test the ability of patients to rate their own cognitive ability using the AD8 compared with informant and clinician ratings of cognitive status.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The AD8 was administered to 325 consecutive participant-informant dyads enrolled in a longitudinal study at Washington University School of Medicine between April 4, 2005, and December 15, 2005. The number of AD8 items endorsed by the participant was compared with informant answers and an independently derived Clinical Dementia Rating.
Strength of association was measured with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients. Receiver operator characteristic curves assessed the discriminative properties of the AD8.
The mean age of participants and informants was 72.8 years (range, 43-104 years) and 66.4 years (range, 24-101 years), respectively. The Clinical Dementia Rating was correlated with both informant (rho = 0.75, P<.001) and participant (rho = 0.34, P<.001) AD8 scores. Participants' AD8 scores had adequate agreement with informants' AD8 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.62) and correlated with subjective complaints of memory problems (rho = 0.47, P<.001) but not with estimates of symptom duration. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the informant AD8 was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93); for the participant AD8, it was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78).
The AD8 is a brief measure that, when completed by an informant, differentiates nondemented from demented individuals. We now demonstrate that a self-completed AD8 also differentiates nondemented from demented individuals, although the utility was better in mildly impaired individuals compared with more demented individuals. In the absence of a reliable informant, the AD8 may be asked of the participant to gain an understanding of their perception of cognitive status.
与认知状况的知情者及临床医生评分相比,测试患者使用AD8自评其自身认知能力的能力。
设计、地点和患者:对2005年4月4日至2005年12月15日在华盛顿大学医学院参与一项纵向研究的325对连续的参与者-知情者二元组进行AD8测试。将参与者认可的AD8项目数量与知情者的回答以及独立得出的临床痴呆评定量表进行比较。
用Spearman(rho)和组内相关系数测量关联强度。受试者工作特征曲线评估AD8的判别特性。
参与者和知情者的平均年龄分别为72.8岁(范围43 - 104岁)和66.4岁(范围24 - 101岁)。临床痴呆评定量表与知情者(rho = 0.75,P <.001)和参与者(rho = 0.34,P <.001)的AD8评分均相关。参与者的AD8评分与知情者的AD8评分有充分的一致性(组内相关系数,0.53;95%置信区间,0.41 - 0.62),并且与记忆问题的主观主诉相关(rho = 0.47,P <.001),但与症状持续时间的估计无关。知情者AD8的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.89(95%置信区间,0.86 - 0.93);参与者AD8的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.78(95%置信区间,0.68 - 0.78)。
AD8是一种简短的测量方法,由知情者完成时可区分非痴呆个体和痴呆个体。我们现在证明,自我完成的AD8也能区分非痴呆个体和痴呆个体,尽管与痴呆程度较重的个体相比,其在轻度受损个体中的效用更好。在没有可靠知情者的情况下,可向参与者询问AD8以了解他们对认知状况的感知。