Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo Japan.
PLoS One. 2007 May 9;2(5):e434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000434.
Phenotype of biological systems needs to be robust against mutation in order to sustain themselves between generations. On the other hand, phenotype of an individual also needs to be robust against fluctuations of both internal and external origins that are encountered during growth and development. Is there a relationship between these two types of robustness, one during a single generation and the other during evolution? Could stochasticity in gene expression have any relevance to the evolution of these types of robustness? Robustness can be defined by the sharpness of the distribution of phenotype; the variance of phenotype distribution due to genetic variation gives a measure of 'genetic robustness', while that of isogenic individuals gives a measure of 'developmental robustness'. Through simulations of a simple stochastic gene expression network that undergoes mutation and selection, we show that in order for the network to acquire both types of robustness, the phenotypic variance induced by mutations must be smaller than that observed in an isogenic population. As the latter originates from noise in gene expression, this signifies that the genetic robustness evolves only when the noise strength in gene expression is larger than some threshold. In such a case, the two variances decrease throughout the evolutionary time course, indicating increase in robustness. The results reveal how noise that cells encounter during growth and development shapes networks' robustness to stochasticity in gene expression, which in turn shapes networks' robustness to mutation. The necessary condition for evolution of robustness, as well as the relationship between genetic and developmental robustness, is derived quantitatively through the variance of phenotypic fluctuations, which are directly measurable experimentally.
生物系统的表型需要具有抗突变的鲁棒性,以在世代之间维持自身。另一方面,个体的表型也需要具有抗内外部波动的鲁棒性,这些波动在生长和发育过程中会遇到。这两种类型的鲁棒性之间是否存在关系,一种是在单个世代中,另一种是在进化过程中?基因表达的随机性与这些类型的鲁棒性的进化有任何关系吗?鲁棒性可以通过表型分布的锐度来定义;由于遗传变异引起的表型分布方差给出了“遗传鲁棒性”的度量,而同源个体的方差则给出了“发育鲁棒性”的度量。通过对经历突变和选择的简单随机基因表达网络的模拟,我们表明,为了使网络获得这两种类型的鲁棒性,突变引起的表型方差必须小于同源群体中观察到的方差。由于后者源于基因表达中的噪声,这意味着只有当基因表达中的噪声强度大于某个阈值时,遗传鲁棒性才会进化。在这种情况下,两个方差在整个进化过程中都会减小,表明鲁棒性增加。这些结果揭示了细胞在生长和发育过程中遇到的噪声如何塑造网络对基因表达随机性的鲁棒性,而网络对基因表达随机性的鲁棒性又如何塑造网络对突变的鲁棒性。通过实验直接可测的表型波动方差,定量推导出了鲁棒性进化的必要条件,以及遗传鲁棒性和发育鲁棒性之间的关系。