• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳健性能够在具有不同拓扑结构的复杂调控基因网络中逐渐演变。

Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology.

作者信息

Ciliberti Stefano, Martin Olivier C, Wagner Andreas

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physique Théoique et Modèles Statistiques, Universite Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 2;3(2):e15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015
PMID:17274682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1794322/
Abstract

The topology of cellular circuits (the who-interacts-with-whom) is key to understand their robustness to both mutations and noise. The reason is that many biochemical parameters driving circuit behavior vary extensively and are thus not fine-tuned. Existing work in this area asks to what extent the function of any one given circuit is robust. But is high robustness truly remarkable, or would it be expected for many circuits of similar topology? And how can high robustness come about through gradual Darwinian evolution that changes circuit topology gradually, one interaction at a time? We here ask these questions for a model of transcriptional regulation networks, in which we explore millions of different network topologies. Robustness to mutations and noise are correlated in these networks. They show a skewed distribution, with a very small number of networks being vastly more robust than the rest. All networks that attain a given gene expression state can be organized into a graph whose nodes are networks that differ in their topology. Remarkably, this graph is connected and can be easily traversed by gradual changes of network topologies. Thus, robustness is an evolvable property. This connectedness and evolvability of robust networks may be a general organizational principle of biological networks. In addition, it exists also for RNA and protein structures, and may thus be a general organizational principle of all biological systems.

摘要

细胞回路的拓扑结构(即谁与谁相互作用)对于理解其对突变和噪声的鲁棒性至关重要。原因在于,驱动回路行为的许多生化参数变化范围很大,因此并未得到精细调节。该领域现有的研究探讨了任何一个给定回路的功能在多大程度上具有鲁棒性。但是,高鲁棒性真的很显著吗?还是说对于许多具有相似拓扑结构的回路来说这是可以预期的?以及高度的鲁棒性如何能通过达尔文式的渐进进化产生,这种进化一次只改变一个相互作用,逐渐改变回路的拓扑结构?我们在此针对转录调控网络模型提出这些问题,在该模型中我们探索了数百万种不同的网络拓扑结构。在这些网络中,对突变和噪声的鲁棒性是相关的。它们呈现出一种偏态分布,极少数网络比其他网络的鲁棒性要强得多。所有达到给定基因表达状态的网络都可以组织成一个图,其节点是拓扑结构不同的网络。值得注意的是,这个图是连通的,并且可以通过网络拓扑结构的逐渐变化轻松遍历。因此,鲁棒性是一种可进化的特性。鲁棒网络的这种连通性和可进化性可能是生物网络的一种普遍组织原则。此外,它在RNA和蛋白质结构中也存在,因此可能是所有生物系统的一种普遍组织原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/d1c46ab6895e/pcbi.0030015.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/acad77712c80/pcbi.0030015.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/8ff6964cbb87/pcbi.0030015.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/dfaf43f5d8af/pcbi.0030015.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/d1c46ab6895e/pcbi.0030015.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/acad77712c80/pcbi.0030015.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/8ff6964cbb87/pcbi.0030015.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/dfaf43f5d8af/pcbi.0030015.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34bd/1808018/d1c46ab6895e/pcbi.0030015.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology.稳健性能够在具有不同拓扑结构的复杂调控基因网络中逐渐演变。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 2;3(2):e15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015.
2
Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators.双基因昼夜节律振荡器的电路拓扑结构与稳健性的演变
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11775-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501094102. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
3
The effect of scale-free topology on the robustness and evolvability of genetic regulatory networks.无标度拓扑结构对遗传调控网络的鲁棒性和可进化性的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2010 Nov 7;267(1):48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
4
Relevance of phenotypic noise to adaptation and evolution.表型噪声与适应和进化的相关性。
IET Syst Biol. 2008 Sep;2(5):234-46. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb:20070078.
5
Multifunctionality and robustness trade-offs in model genetic circuits.模型遗传回路中的多功能性与稳健性权衡
Biophys J. 2008 Apr 15;94(8):2927-37. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114348.
6
Evolution of evolvability in gene regulatory networks.基因调控网络中可进化性的进化
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jul 11;4(7):e1000112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000112.
7
Evolvability and robustness in a complex signalling circuit.复杂信号通路中的进化能力与稳健性
Mol Biosyst. 2011 Apr;7(4):1081-92. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00165a. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Survival of the sparsest: robust gene networks are parsimonious.最精简者的生存:稳健的基因网络是简约的。
Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:213. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.52. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
9
Signal transduction networks: topology, response and biochemical processes.信号转导网络:拓扑结构、反应及生化过程
J Theor Biol. 2006 Jan 21;238(2):416-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.030. Epub 2005 Jul 20.
10
Mapping network motif tunability and robustness in the design of synthetic signaling circuits.在合成信号转导回路的设计中,对网络基元的可调谐性和稳健性进行映射。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091743. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Pleiotropy and Epistasis on Evolvability and Robustness in a Two-Peak Fitness Landscape.多效性和上位性在双峰适应度景观中对进化能力和稳健性的作用
Biology (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;13(12):1003. doi: 10.3390/biology13121003.
2
Phenotype selection due to mutational robustness.由于突变稳定性导致的表型选择。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0311058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311058. eCollection 2024.
3
Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning.形态发生素在大小、形状和模式进化中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
DOES EVOLUTIONARY PLASTICITY EVOLVE?进化可塑性会进化吗?
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):1008-1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02342.x.
2
A simple model of circadian rhythms based on dimerization and proteolysis of PER and TIM.基于 PER 和 TIM 二聚化和蛋白水解的昼夜节律简单模型。
Biophys J. 1999 Nov;77(5):2411-7. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77078-5. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
3
In silico predicted robustness of viroids RNA secondary structures. I. The effect of single mutations.计算机模拟预测类病毒RNA二级结构的稳定性。I. 单突变的影响。
Development. 2024 Sep 15;151(18). doi: 10.1242/dev.202412. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Expanding evolutionary theories of ageing to better account for symbioses and interactions throughout the Web of Life.拓展衰老的进化理论,以更好地解释整个生命之网中的共生关系和相互作用。
Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Aug;89:101982. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101982. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
CastNet: a systems-level sequence evolution simulator.CastNet:一种系统级序列进化模拟器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Jun 12;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05366-1.
6
Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks.合成基因型网络的稳健性与创新性。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 28;14(1):2454. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38033-3.
7
The Topological Characteristics of Biological Ratio-Sensing Networks.生物比率传感网络的拓扑特征
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;13(2):351. doi: 10.3390/life13020351.
8
A linear reciprocal relationship between robustness and plasticity in homeostatic biological networks.在稳态生物网络中,稳健性和可塑性之间存在线性互惠关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0277181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277181. eCollection 2023.
9
The ensemble of gene regulatory networks at mutation-selection balance.处于突变-选择平衡的基因调控网络集合。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jan;20(198):20220075. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0075. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
10
Functional Resilience of Mutually Repressing Motifs Embedded in Larger Networks.功能弹性:嵌入大型网络中的相互抑制基序。
Biomolecules. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):1842. doi: 10.3390/biom12121842.
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jul;23(7):1427-36. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl005. Epub 2006 May 5.
4
Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.有性生殖在人工基因网络中选择强健性和负上位性。
Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):87-90. doi: 10.1038/nature04488.
5
Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.一种RNA病毒中突变稳健性的演变
PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030381. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
6
Evolutionary population genetics of promoters: predicting binding sites and functional phylogenies.启动子的进化群体遗传学:预测结合位点和功能系统发育。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505537102. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
7
Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic.真核细胞是动态有序的,至关重要但并非混乱无序。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 20;102(38):13439-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506771102. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
8
Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators.双基因昼夜节律振荡器的电路拓扑结构与稳健性的演变
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11775-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501094102. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
9
Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks.基因调控网络布尔模型的稳健性与脆弱性
J Theor Biol. 2005 Aug 7;235(3):431-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.023. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
10
MONKEY: identifying conserved transcription-factor binding sites in multiple alignments using a binding site-specific evolutionary model.MONKEY:使用结合位点特异性进化模型在多序列比对中识别保守转录因子结合位点。
Genome Biol. 2004;5(12):R98. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r98. Epub 2004 Nov 30.