Suppr超能文献

现有问卷对症状性腹水进行腹腔穿刺术后症状变化的测量能力。

The ability of existing questionnaires to measure symptom change after paracentesis for symptomatic ascites.

作者信息

Easson Alexandra M, Bezjak Andrea, Ross Susan, Wright Jim G

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Aug;14(8):2348-57. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9370-3. Epub 2007 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic malignant ascites is a problem for patients with advanced intra-abdominal malignancy. Although the goal of paracentesis, the most common therapeutic intervention, is symptom palliation, the best method of assessing symptom improvement is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of existing symptom and quality-of-life questionnaires to detect change in symptoms after paracentesis.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic ascites completed four questionnaires before and 24 hours after paracentesis. These tests were Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Ascites Modification (ESAS:AM), Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, 26-item pancreatic cancer module (QLQ-PAN26). Sensitivity, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the questionnaires were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients completed the baseline and 44 the follow-up questionnaire. Most patients had ovarian (41%) or gastrointestinal cancer (25%); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 2 (26%) and 3 (49%). Patients reported major symptoms at baseline; symptom scores were highest for the clinically recognized symptoms of ascites. Most patients (78%) reported that their symptoms improved after paracentesis. All questionnaires showed strong sensitivity, validity, and reliability. Subscales that included the most distressing symptoms were most responsive; great improvement was seen in abdominal bloating (42% to 54%), anorexia (20% to 37%), dyspnea (33% to 43%), insomnia (29% to 31%), fatigue (14% to 17%), and mobility (25%). The amount of fluid removed (median, 3.5 L; range, .3% to 9.7 L) did not correlate with symptom improvement (r = .29, P = -.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Paracentesis provides symptom relief that can be measured by existing questionnaires. For future clinical trials of symptomatic ascites, the QLQ-C30 and the ESAS:AM together, or the QLQ-C30 with the addition of the QLQ-PAN26 ascites and abdominal pain subscales could be used.

摘要

背景

有症状的恶性腹水是晚期腹腔内恶性肿瘤患者面临的一个问题。虽然腹腔穿刺术作为最常见的治疗干预手段,其目标是缓解症状,但评估症状改善的最佳方法尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估现有的症状和生活质量问卷检测腹腔穿刺术后症状变化的能力。

方法

有症状性腹水的患者在腹腔穿刺术前和术后24小时完成了四份问卷。这些测试包括埃德蒙顿症状评估系统-腹水修正版(ESAS:AM)、纪念症状评估量表简版、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)以及EORTC核心生活质量问卷、26项胰腺癌模块(QLQ-PAN26)。对问卷的敏感性、有效性、可靠性和反应性进行了评估。

结果

61名患者完成了基线问卷,44名完成了随访问卷。大多数患者患有卵巢癌(41%)或胃肠道癌(25%);东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为2(26%)和3(49%)。患者在基线时报告有主要症状;腹水的临床公认症状的症状评分最高。大多数患者(78%)报告腹腔穿刺术后症状有所改善。所有问卷均显示出较强的敏感性、有效性和可靠性。包含最令人痛苦症状的子量表反应性最强;腹胀(42%至54%)、厌食(20%至37%)、呼吸困难(33%至43%)、失眠(29%至31%)、疲劳(14%至17%)和活动能力(25%)有显著改善。抽出的腹水量(中位数为3.5L;范围为0.3%至9.7L)与症状改善无关(r = 0.29,P = -0.10)。

结论

腹腔穿刺术可缓解症状,且可通过现有问卷进行测量。对于未来有症状性腹水的临床试验,可联合使用QLQ-C30和ESAS:AM,或在QLQ-C30基础上增加QLQ-PAN26的腹水和腹痛子量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验