Bürgin Dieter, Steck Barbara
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik Basel-Stadt.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2007;56(4):310-32. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2007.56.4.310.
A brief survey of the psychoanalytically oriented literature regarding the symptom triad of ADHD is followed by the discussion of frequently found disturbances in infantile development, attachment, object relations (regulation of drives and affects, ego functions) of the role of infantile trauma (object loss) and psychic conflict. In the analytic-psychotherapeutic process with a child, the ADHD-symptom-triad may manifest itself e.g. as intrapsychic conflict on the level of the self-representation or of the representation of central self-object-relations (characterized by an insufficient containing-/holding-function), as impairment of self-regulative functions, as inconsistent symbolizing capacity or as deficient regulating and controlling capacity of the ego. The multitude of factors involved does not allow a generalisation of neither the etiology or the pathogenesis of this symptom triad. This is particularly evident in a therapeutic procedure which is relation oriented. In a first interview the authors illustrate the capacity of a ten year old boy (diagnosed as ADHD patient) to make use of the analytic therapeutic dialogue and to present his intrapsychic experiences and problems in a figurative and narrative performance. Finally some specific technical features of low or high frequent analytic psychotherapy with ADHD children are shown: according to the foremost pregenital form of relations--manifested mostly by intensive self esteem problems, narcissistic aggressiveness and motor impulsivity--the transference and counter-transference movements proceed predominantly by projective and introjective identifications. Containment of the difficulties by the therapist is often paralleled for a long period of time by assistance in regulation and by limit setting for the child. Translation of action into language and transformation of intrapsychic processes within the psyche of the therapist into helpful interventions for the child require a continuous adjustment to the inconsistent ego functions and the fragile self esteem of the child. The additional use of stimulant drugs, the work within the family and/or the social context and the high need for research in the analytical field are briefly discussed at the end.
本文首先简要概述了以精神分析为导向的关于注意力缺陷多动障碍症状三联征的文献,接着讨论了在婴儿期发展、依恋、客体关系(驱力和情感调节、自我功能)中常见的干扰因素,以及婴儿期创伤(客体丧失)和心理冲突的作用。在对儿童进行分析性心理治疗的过程中,注意力缺陷多动障碍症状三联征可能表现为例如自我表征层面或核心自我-客体关系表征层面的心理冲突(其特征为容纳/抱持功能不足)、自我调节功能受损、象征能力不一致或自我的调节和控制能力不足。涉及的众多因素使得无法对该症状三联征的病因或发病机制进行概括。这在以关系为导向的治疗过程中尤为明显。在首次访谈中,作者展示了一名10岁男孩(被诊断为注意力缺陷多动障碍患者)利用分析性治疗对话并以形象化和叙事性的方式呈现其内心体验和问题的能力。最后展示了对注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童进行低频或高频分析性心理治疗的一些具体技术特点:根据主要以前生殖器期关系形式呈现的情况——主要表现为强烈的自尊问题、自恋攻击性和运动冲动性——移情和反移情的发展主要通过投射性和内摄性认同进行。治疗师对困难的容纳往往在很长一段时间内伴随着对儿童调节的协助和设定界限。将行动转化为语言以及将治疗师内心的心理过程转化为对儿童有帮助的干预措施需要不断适应儿童不一致的自我功能和脆弱的自尊。最后简要讨论了额外使用兴奋剂药物、在家庭和/或社会背景下开展的工作以及分析领域对研究的高度需求。