González-Díaz Humberto, Vilar Santiago, Santana Lourdes, Uriarte Eugenio
Department of Organic Chemistry & Institute of Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
Curr Top Med Chem. 2007;7(10):1015-29. doi: 10.2174/156802607780906771.
The numerical encoding of chemical structure with Topological Indices (TIs) is currently growing in importance in Medicinal Chemistry and Bioinformatics. This approach allows the rapid collection, annotation, retrieval, comparison and mining of chemical structures within large databases. TIs can subsequently be used to seek quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR), which are models connecting chemical structure with biological activity. In the early 1990's, there was an explosion in the introduction and definition of new TIs. The Handbook of Molecular Descriptors by Todeschini and Consonni lists more than 1500 of these indices. At the end of the last century, researchers produced a large number of TIs with essentially the same advantages and/or disadvantages. Consequently, many researchers abandoned the definition of TIs for a time. In our opinion, one of the problems associated with TIs is that researchers aimed their efforts only at the codification of chemical connectivity for small-sized drugs. As a consequence, recently it seems that we have arrived at "Fukuyama's End of History in TIs definition". In the work described here, we review and comment on the "quo vadis" and challenges in the definition of TIs as we enter the new century. Emphasis is placed on new chiral TIs (CTIs), flexible TIs for unifying QSAR models with multiple targets, topographic indices (TPGIs), TIs for DNA and protein sequences, TIs for 2D RNA structures, TPGIs and drug-protein or drug-RNA quantitative structure-binding relationship (QSBR) studies, TIs to encode protein surface information and TIs for protein interaction networks (PINs).
利用拓扑指数(TIs)对化学结构进行数字编码,目前在药物化学和生物信息学领域的重要性日益凸显。这种方法能够在大型数据库中快速收集、注释、检索、比较和挖掘化学结构。随后,拓扑指数可用于寻找定量构效关系(QSAR),即连接化学结构与生物活性的模型。在20世纪90年代初,新拓扑指数的引入和定义出现了爆发式增长。托德斯基尼和孔索尼所著的《分子描述符手册》列出了1500多种此类指数。在上个世纪末,研究人员开发出了大量具有基本相同优缺点的拓扑指数。因此,许多研究人员一度放弃了拓扑指数的定义。在我们看来,与拓扑指数相关的一个问题是,研究人员仅将精力集中在小型药物化学连接性的编码上。结果,最近我们似乎已到了“拓扑指数定义的福山历史终结”阶段。在本文所述的工作中,我们回顾并评论了进入新世纪后拓扑指数定义的“发展方向”和挑战。重点在于新型手性拓扑指数(CTIs)、用于统一多靶点QSAR模型的柔性拓扑指数、地形指数(TPGIs)、用于DNA和蛋白质序列的拓扑指数、用于二维RNA结构 的拓扑指数、TPGIs与药物 - 蛋白质或药物 - RNA定量结构 - 结合关系(QSBR)研究、用于编码蛋白质表面信息的拓扑指数以及用于蛋白质相互作用网络(PINs)的拓扑指数。