Ninan T M, Costa M L, Krikler S J
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.
Injury. 2007 Jun;38(6):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.053.
Classification systems for fractures of the femur with a prosthetic hip in situ are diverse and complex. Most of them are based on the site of the fracture, which is not the most important differentiating factor in treatment planning. The Coventry classification system groups the periprosthetic fractures into 'happy hips' and 'unhappy hips' based on whether or not the stem is loose. In 'happy' hips, treatment only needs to address the fracture itself, unless the fixation has been compromised by the fracture. In the 'unhappy hips', revision of the prosthesis is recommended.
原位人工髋关节股骨骨折的分类系统多样且复杂。其中大多数基于骨折部位,而这并非治疗计划中最重要的区分因素。考文垂分类系统根据假体柄是否松动,将假体周围骨折分为“稳定型髋关节”和“不稳定型髋关节”。在“稳定型”髋关节中,除非骨折影响了固定,否则治疗只需处理骨折本身。而在“不稳定型”髋关节中,则建议翻修假体。