Wise Mark G, Healy Mimi, Reece Kristy, Smith Rebecca, Walton Dobbie, Dutch Wendy, Renwick Alex, Huong Joe, Young Steve, Tarrand Jeffrey, Kontoyiannis Dimitrios P
Bacterial Barcodes Inc., Athens, GA 30602, USA.
TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.
J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jun;56(Pt 6):778-787. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47106-0.
The DiversiLab system, which uses repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) to genotype micro-organisms, was evaluated as a molecular typing tool for members of the genus Candida. Initially, 41 clinical Candida spp. (7 Candida krusei, 10 Candida parapsilosis, 7 Candida albicans, 10 Candida tropicalis and 7 Candida glabrata), previously identified at the species level by morphological and biochemical analysis, were analysed with the DiversiLab system. Species identification was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis of the contiguous internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2). On the basis of an 80 % similarity threshold, rep-PCR consistently clustered like species and this set of isolates, along with five ATCC reference strains, was used to create a DNA fingerprint library with the DiversiLab software. Subsequently, an additional set of 115 clinical Candida isolates, identified biochemically as C. albicans (n=94), C. glabrata (n=8), C. parapsilosis (n=5), C. tropicalis (n=3), C. krusei (n=3) and Candida lusitaniae (n=2), isolated at a regional reference laboratory, were typed using DiversiLab. One hundred and six of these isolates clustered with members of the Candida library at >80 % similarity and thus could be assigned species identification, and initial calculations showed that identification via rep-PCR fingerprinting was 95 % concordant (101/106) with the biochemical/morphological identification. However, ITS region sequencing of the five discrepant samples, as well as the nine isolates that were <80 % similar to the database samples, showed that nine were misidentified with traditional biochemical/morphological methods. For the misidentified isolates, the sequence-based identification was in agreement with the DiversiLab clustering, yielding an actual correlation of >99 %. As traditional techniques can take several days to provide information about Candida at the genus/species level, genotyping with the DiversiLab system holds promise for more-rapid speciation of members of this genus. This system may also be useful for epidemiological studies such as source tracking that require Candida subspecies discrimination.
DiversiLab系统利用基于重复序列的聚合酶链反应(rep-PCR)对微生物进行基因分型,被评估为念珠菌属成员的分子分型工具。最初,对41株临床念珠菌(7株克鲁斯念珠菌、10株近平滑念珠菌、7株白念珠菌、10株热带念珠菌和7株光滑念珠菌)进行分析,这些菌株先前已通过形态学和生化分析在种水平上进行了鉴定。通过对连续内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域(ITS1-5.8S-ITS2)的DNA序列分析确认了种的鉴定。基于80%的相似性阈值,rep-PCR始终将相似的种聚类在一起,并且使用这组分离株以及五株ATCC参考菌株,通过DiversiLab软件创建了一个DNA指纹图谱库。随后,对在一个区域参考实验室分离的另外115株临床念珠菌分离株进行分型,这些分离株经生化鉴定为白念珠菌(n=94)、光滑念珠菌(n=8)、近平滑念珠菌(n=5)、热带念珠菌(n=3)、克鲁斯念珠菌(n=3)和葡萄牙念珠菌(n=2)。其中106株分离株与念珠菌库成员的相似性>80%,因此可以进行种的鉴定,初步计算表明,通过rep-PCR指纹图谱进行的鉴定与生化/形态学鉴定的一致性为95%(101/106)。然而,对五个不一致样本以及与数据库样本相似性<80%的九株分离株的ITS区域测序表明,有九株通过传统生化/形态学方法被错误鉴定。对于被错误鉴定的分离株,基于序列的鉴定与DiversiLab聚类结果一致,实际相关性>99%。由于传统技术可能需要几天时间才能提供念珠菌属/种水平的信息,使用DiversiLab系统进行基因分型有望实现该属成员更快的物种形成。该系统也可能有助于进行需要区分念珠菌亚种的流行病学研究,如源头追踪。