Scott Thomas F
Department of Neurology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Jun;115(6):371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00835.x.
Several terms are now commonly used to describe various presentations of idiopathic myelitis, including acute transverse myelitis, acute partial transverse myelitis, and secondary myelitis. Ideally, a classification system would be able to encompass various presentations in a manner that not only assists in prognosis, but also in treatment decisions. Unfortunately, we are limited in our ability to accurately identify those patients who will progress to develop multiple sclerosis, Devic's syndrome, relapsing myelitis, or will remain monophasic. However, general principles are emerging that assist in prognosis based on the particular presenting features of any patient. We review the most recent criteria proposed for various forms of transverse myelitis and highlight the limitations of these classification schemes.
目前有几个术语常用于描述特发性脊髓炎的各种表现形式,包括急性横贯性脊髓炎、急性部分横贯性脊髓炎和继发性脊髓炎。理想情况下,一个分类系统应能够以一种不仅有助于预后判断,而且有助于治疗决策的方式涵盖各种表现形式。不幸的是,我们准确识别那些将进展为多发性硬化症、视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病、复发性脊髓炎或仍为单相病程患者的能力有限。然而,基于任何患者的特定表现特征,有助于预后判断的一般原则正在形成。我们回顾了针对各种形式横贯性脊髓炎提出的最新标准,并强调了这些分类方案的局限性。