Suppr超能文献

非手术脊柱减压疗法:科学文献是否支持广告媒体所宣称的疗效?

Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy: does the scientific literature support efficacy claims made in the advertising media?

作者信息

Daniel Dwain M

机构信息

Parker Research Institute, Parker College of Chiropractic, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 May 18;15:7. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traction therapy has been utilized in the treatment of low back pain for decades. The most recent incarnation of traction therapy is non-surgical spinal decompression therapy which can cost over $100,000. This form of therapy has been heavily marketed to manual therapy professions and subsequently to the consumer. The purpose of this paper is to initiate a debate pertaining to the relationship between marketing claims and the scientific literature on non-surgical spinal decompression.

DISCUSSION

Only one small randomized controlled trial and several lower level efficacy studies have been performed on spinal decompression therapy. In general the quality of these studies is questionable. Many of the studies were performed using the VAX-D unit which places the patient in a prone position. Often companies utilize this research for their marketing although their units place the patient in the supine position.

SUMMARY

Only limited evidence is available to warrant the routine use of non-surgical spinal decompression, particularly when many other well investigated, less expensive alternatives are available.

摘要

背景

牵引疗法已被用于治疗腰痛数十年。牵引疗法的最新形式是非手术脊柱减压疗法,其费用可能超过10万美元。这种疗法已大力向手法治疗行业推销,随后又面向消费者。本文的目的是引发一场关于营销宣传与非手术脊柱减压科学文献之间关系的辩论。

讨论

关于脊柱减压疗法仅进行了一项小型随机对照试验和几项较低水平的疗效研究。总体而言,这些研究的质量令人质疑。许多研究使用的是VAX - D设备,该设备使患者处于俯卧位。尽管公司的设备让患者处于仰卧位,但它们常常利用这些研究进行营销。

总结

仅有有限的证据支持非手术脊柱减压的常规使用,特别是当有许多其他经过充分研究且成本较低的替代方法时。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验