Suppr超能文献

罗非昔布与吉西他滨持续恒速输注用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的Ⅲ期析因随机试验:非小细胞肺癌中的吉西他滨-昔布(GECO)研究

Factorial phase III randomised trial of rofecoxib and prolonged constant infusion of gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the GEmcitabine-COxib in NSCLC (GECO) study.

作者信息

Gridelli Cesare, Gallo Ciro, Ceribelli Anna, Gebbia Vittorio, Gamucci Teresa, Ciardiello Fortunato, Carozza Francesco, Favaretto Adolfo, Daniele Bruno, Galetta Domenico, Barbera Santi, Rosetti Francesco, Rossi Antonio, Maione Paolo, Cognetti Francesco, Testa Antonio, Di Maio Massimo, Morabito Alessandro, Perrone Francesco

机构信息

Medical Oncology, S Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):500-12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70146-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The addition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and prolonged constant infusion (PCI) of gemcitabine to treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might improve treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess whether the addition of rofecoxib or PCI gemcitabine could improve overall survival compared with first-line treatment with cisplatin plus gemcitabine given by standard infusion.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV or IIIb (with supraclavicular nodes or pleural effusion) NSCLC who were under 70 years of age and who had performance status 0 or 1 were eligible for this multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised phase III trial with 2 x 2 factorial design. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: group A, gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) in a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group B, the same treatments as group A plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression; group C, intravenous PCI gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) in a 120-min infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group D, the same drugs as group C plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response rate, quality of life, and toxicity. Analyses were intention-to-treat. This trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the US National Institutes of Health website http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00385606.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2003, and May 3, 2005, 400 patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years (range 29-71). PCI gemcitabine did not improve overall survival (median 47 weeks [95% CI 40-55] vs 44 [36-52], with standard gemcitabine infusion, hazard ratio (HR) of death 0.93 [0.74-1.17], p=0.41), progression-free survival, nor any other secondary endpoint. Vomiting and fatigue were significantly worse with PCI gemcitabine. The two rofecoxib groups were closed early (on Oct 1, 2004) due to withdrawal of the drug because of safety issues. With intention-to-treat statistical analyses limited to 240 patients (ie, those randomised before July 1, 2004) who had at least 3 months of treatment, rofecoxib did not prolong overall survival (median 44 weeks [CI 36-55] vs 44 [40-54] without rofecoxib, and HR of death 1.00 [0.75-1.34], p=0.85), or progression-free survival, but did improve response rate (41%vs 26%, p=0.02), global quality of life, physical, emotional and role functioning, fatigue, and sleeping. Rofecoxib significantly increased the incidence of diarrhoea and decreased constipation, fatigue, fever, weight loss, and pain, and analgesic consumption. Severe cardiac ischaemia was more frequent with rofecoxib than without; however, the difference was not statistically significant in the primary analysis (p=0.06) and became significant when patients who were randomised between July 1, 2004, and Sept 30, 2004, were included in the analysis (p=0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Neither PCI gemcitabine nor rofecoxib prolonged survival in the patients in this study. Rofecoxib improved response rate and several quality-of-life items, including pain-related items and global quality of life. Further studies with less cardiotoxic COX-2 inhibitors are needed in NSCLC.

摘要

背景

在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗中添加环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂以及延长吉西他滨持续静脉输注(PCI)可能会提高治疗效果。我们旨在评估与标准输注顺铂加吉西他滨的一线治疗相比,添加罗非昔布或PCI吉西他滨是否能改善总生存期。

方法

年龄在70岁以下、体能状态为0或1的IV期或IIIb期(有锁骨上淋巴结或胸腔积液)NSCLC患者符合本多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、2×2析因设计的随机III期试验。患者被随机分配到四个治疗组之一:A组,第1天和第8天静脉输注30分钟给予吉西他滨1200mg/m²,第1天静脉输注顺铂80mg/m²,每21天为一周期,共六个周期;B组,与A组相同治疗加口服罗非昔布50mg/天直至疾病进展;C组,第1天和第8天静脉输注120分钟给予PCI吉西他滨1200mg/m²,第1天静脉输注顺铂80mg/m²,每21天为一周期,共六个周期;D组,与C组相同药物加口服罗非昔布50mg/天直至疾病进展。主要终点是总生存期;次要终点是无进展生存期、缓解率、生活质量和毒性。分析采用意向性治疗。本试验已在美国国立卫生研究院网站http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00385606的临床试验网站注册。

结果

2003年1月30日至2005年5月3日期间,共入组400例患者。中位年龄为60岁(范围29 - 71岁)。PCI吉西他滨未改善总生存期(中位生存期47周[95%CI 40 - 55]与标准吉西他滨输注的44周[36 - 52]相比,死亡风险比(HR)为0.93[0.74 - 1.17],p = 0.41)、无进展生存期或任何其他次要终点。PCI吉西他滨导致的呕吐和疲劳明显更严重。由于安全问题药物撤市,两个罗非昔布组提前关闭(2004年10月1日)。对至少接受3个月治疗的240例患者(即2004年7月1日前随机分组者)进行意向性治疗统计分析,罗非昔布未延长总生存期(中位生存期44周[CI 36 - 55]与未用罗非昔布的44周[40 - 54]相比,死亡HR为1.00[0.75 - 1.34],p = 0.85)或无进展生存期,但改善了缓解率(41%对26%,p = 0.02)、整体生活质量、身体、情感和角色功能、疲劳及睡眠。罗非昔布显著增加腹泻发生率,减少便秘、疲劳、发热、体重减轻和疼痛以及镇痛药使用量出现。与未用罗非昔布相比,罗非昔布组严重心脏缺血更频繁;然而,在初步分析中差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06),当纳入2004年7月1日至9月30日随机分组的患者进行分析时差异变得显著(p = 0.03)。

解读

在本研究患者中,PCI吉西他滨和罗非昔布均未延长生存期。罗非昔布改善了缓解率和几个生活质量指标,包括与疼痛相关的指标和整体生活质量。NSCLC需要进一步研究心脏毒性较小的COX-2抑制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验