• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How much do emergency healthcare workers know about capacity and consent?急救医护人员对医疗能力和同意权了解多少?
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):391-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041293.
2
How much do doctors know about consent and capacity?医生对同意和行为能力了解多少?
J R Soc Med. 2002 Dec;95(12):601-3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.12.601.
3
Disaster management: Emergency nursing and medical personnel's knowledge, attitude and practices of the East Coast region hospitals of Malaysia.灾害管理:马来西亚东海岸地区医院急诊护理及医务人员的知识、态度与实践
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Nov;19(4):203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
Error identification, disclosure, and reporting: practice patterns of three emergency medicine provider types.错误识别、披露与报告:三种急诊医学提供者类型的实践模式
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;11(2):196-9.
5
Occupational burnout levels in emergency medicine--a nationwide study and analysis.急诊医学中的职业倦怠水平——一项全国性研究与分析
J Med Life. 2010 Jul-Sep;3(3):207-15.
6
Prehospital Airway Management in Emergency and Trauma Patients: A Cross-sectional Study of Ambulance Service Providers and Staff in a Low- and Middle-income Country.低收入和中等收入国家急诊与创伤患者的院前气道管理:对救护车服务提供者及工作人员的横断面研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Dec;30(6):606-12. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005385. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
1992 program survey. Eighth Annual Air Medical Program Survey.1992年项目调查。第八次年度空中医疗项目调查。
J Air Med Transp. 1992 May;11(5):21-3.
8
Audit of tetanus prevention knowledge and practices in accident and emergency departments in England.英格兰急诊科破伤风预防知识与实践的审计
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):417-21. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.047399.
9
Consent to treatment in the A&E department.
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002 Jan;10(1):17-25. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2001.0303.
10
1993 program survey.1993年项目调查。
Air Med J. 1993 Sep;12(9):306, 307-10, 312. doi: 10.1016/S1067-991X(05)80075-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Capacity Assessments for COVID-19 Patients: Emergency Admissions and the CARD Approach.COVID-19 患者的精神能力评估:急诊入院和 CARD 方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):803-808. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10055-2. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate.如何规范自服药物的权利。
HEC Forum. 2022 Sep;34(3):233-255. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7.
3
Advance decisions to refuse treatment and suicidal behaviour in emergency care: 'it's very much a step into the unknown'.急诊护理中拒绝治疗的预先决定与自杀行为:“这很大程度上是迈向未知的一步”。
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jun 13;5(4):e50. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.42.
4
Responding to abusive patients: a primer for ethics committee members.应对辱骂患者:伦理委员会成员入门指南
HEC Forum. 2008 Jun;20(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s10730-008-9066-5.
5
Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act.评估精神能力:《精神能力法案》
BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):322-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39457.485347.80.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-harm, capacity, and refusal of treatment: implications for emergency medical practice. A prospective observational study.自我伤害、行为能力与拒绝治疗:对急诊医疗实践的影响。一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Nov;22(11):799-802. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.018671.
2
The discrepancy between the legal definition of capacity and the British Medical Association's guidelines.行为能力的法律定义与英国医学协会指南之间的差异。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Oct;30(5):427-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.003822.
3
How much do doctors know about consent and capacity?医生对同意和行为能力了解多少?
J R Soc Med. 2002 Dec;95(12):601-3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.12.601.
4
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
All Engl Law Rep. 1992 Jul 30;[1992]4:649-70.
5
Lesson of the week: managing patients with deliberate self harm who refuse treatment in the accident and emergency department.本周经验教训:在急诊科处理拒绝治疗的蓄意自伤患者。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):107-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.107.

急救医护人员对医疗能力和同意权了解多少?

How much do emergency healthcare workers know about capacity and consent?

作者信息

Evans Katharine, Warner James, Jackson Elizabeth

机构信息

Emergency Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):391-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041293.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2006.041293
PMID:17513532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2658269/
Abstract

AIM

To assess knowledge of capacity and consent among emergency healthcare workers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey with a structured questionnaire.

METHODS

86 questionnaires were distributed and completed by 42 accident and emergency doctors, 21 accident and emergency nurses, and 23 emergency ambulance staff. Correct answers on assessing capacity to consent to or refuse treatment were given by 67% of the doctors and 10% of the nurses, but by none of the ambulance workers. 15% of all respondents wrongly believed that an adult who is found to have capacity can lawfully be treated against his or her will.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that emergency healthcare workers do not have adequate knowledge about how to assess capacity and treat people who either refuse treatment or lack capacity. It shows a need for further training among doctors, nurses and ambulance staff working in the emergency setting.

摘要

目的

评估急救医护人员对行为能力和同意权的认知。

设计

采用结构化问卷进行横断面调查。

方法

分发了86份问卷,由42名急诊医生、21名急诊护士和23名急救车工作人员填写并完成。67%的医生和10%的护士正确回答了关于评估同意或拒绝治疗的行为能力的问题,但急救车工作人员无人答对。所有受访者中有15%错误地认为,被认定有行为能力的成年人可以在其违背意愿的情况下被合法治疗。

结论

本研究结果表明,急救医护人员对如何评估行为能力以及如何治疗拒绝治疗或无行为能力的人缺乏足够的认知。这表明在急诊环境中工作的医生、护士和急救车工作人员需要进一步培训。