Suppr超能文献

急诊护理中拒绝治疗的预先决定与自杀行为:“这很大程度上是迈向未知的一步”。

Advance decisions to refuse treatment and suicidal behaviour in emergency care: 'it's very much a step into the unknown'.

作者信息

Quinlivan Leah, Nowland Rebecca, Steeg Sarah, Cooper Jayne, Meehan Declan, Godfrey Joseph, Robertson Duncan, Longson Damien, Potokar John, Davies Rosie, Allen Neil, Huxtable Richard, Mackway-Jones Kevin, Hawton Keith, Gunnell David, Kapur Nav

机构信息

Research Associate, Centre for Suicide Prevention, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester; and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, UK.

Research Associate, Centre for Suicide Prevention, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2019 Jun 13;5(4):e50. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex challenges may arise when patients present to emergency services with an advance decision to refuse life-saving treatment following suicidal behaviour.

AIMS

To investigate the use of advance decisions to refuse treatment in the context of suicidal behaviour from the perspective of clinicians and people with lived experience of self-harm and/or psychiatric services.

METHOD

Forty-one participants aged 18 or over from hospital services (emergency departments, liaison psychiatry and ambulance services) and groups of individuals with experience of psychiatric services and/or self-harm were recruited to six focus groups in a multisite study in England. Data were collected in 2016 using a structured topic guide and included a fictional vignette. They were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

RESULTS

Advance decisions to refuse treatment for suicidal behaviour were contentious across groups. Three main themes emerged from the data: (a) they may enhance patient autonomy and aid clarity in acute emergencies, but also create legal and ethical uncertainty over treatment following self-harm; (b) they are anxiety provoking for clinicians; and (c) in practice, there are challenges in validation (for example, validating the patient's mental capacity at the time of writing), time constraints and significant legal/ethical complexities.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for patients to refuse life-saving treatment following suicidal behaviour in a legal document was challenging and anxiety provoking for participants. Clinicians should act with caution given the potential for recovery and fluctuations in suicidal ideation. Currently, advance decisions to refuse treatment have questionable use in the context of suicidal behaviour given the challenges in validation. Discussion and further patient research are needed in this area.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

D.G., K.H. and N.K. are members of the Department of Health's (England) National Suicide Prevention Advisory Group. N.K. chaired the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline development group for the longer-term management of self-harm and the NICE Topic Expert Group (which developed the quality standards for self-harm services). He is currently chair of the updated NICE guideline for Depression. K.H. and D.G. are NIHR Senior Investigators. K.H. is also supported by the Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust and N.K. by the Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust.

摘要

背景

当患者因有自杀行为而预先决定拒绝挽救生命的治疗并前往急诊服务机构时,可能会出现复杂的挑战。

目的

从临床医生以及有过自残和/或精神科服务经历的人的角度,调查在自杀行为背景下预先决定拒绝治疗的使用情况。

方法

在英国的一项多地点研究中,从医院服务部门(急诊科、联络精神病学和救护车服务)招募了41名18岁及以上的参与者,以及有精神科服务和/或自残经历的个体群体,组成六个焦点小组。2016年使用结构化主题指南收集数据,包括一个虚构的案例。采用主题框架分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

针对自杀行为拒绝治疗的预先决定在各群体中存在争议。数据中出现了三个主要主题:(a) 它们可能增强患者自主权并有助于在急性紧急情况下明确情况,但也会在自残后的治疗方面造成法律和伦理上的不确定性;(b) 它们会引发临床医生的焦虑;(c) 在实践中,在验证方面存在挑战(例如,验证患者撰写时的精神能力)、时间限制以及重大的法律/伦理复杂性。

结论

患者在法律文件中拒绝自杀行为后挽救生命治疗的可能性,对参与者来说具有挑战性且会引发焦虑。鉴于存在康复可能性以及自杀意念的波动,临床医生应谨慎行事。鉴于验证方面的挑战,目前在自杀行为背景下预先决定拒绝治疗的用途存疑。该领域需要进行讨论并开展进一步的患者研究。

利益声明

D.G.、K.H. 和 N.K. 是英国卫生部国家自杀预防咨询小组的成员。N.K. 担任国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)自残长期管理指南制定小组主席以及NICE主题专家组(该组制定了自残服务质量标准)主席。他目前是NICE抑郁症更新指南的主席。K.H. 和 D.G. 是英国国家卫生研究院高级研究员。K.H. 还得到牛津健康国民保健服务基金会信托基金的支持,N.K. 得到大曼彻斯特精神健康国民保健服务基金会信托基金的支持。

相似文献

2
Management of patients with an advance decision and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e023978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023978.
8
Presentations to NSW emergency departments with self-harm, suicidal ideation, or intentional poisoning, 2010-2014.
Med J Aust. 2018 May 7;208(8):348-353. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00589. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
10
Using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment in Primary Care: a mixed methods study.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(42):1-155. doi: 10.3310/NVTF7521.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of patients with an advance decision and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e023978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023978.
4
The Mental Capacity Act: a review of the current literature.
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Aug 2;21(8):406-10. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.8.406.
5
Decision-making competence and attempted suicide.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;76(12):e1590-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m09778.
6
Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees.
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 16;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.
7
Fluctuating capacity and advance decision-making in Bipolar Affective Disorder - Self-binding directives and self-determination.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
Embedding the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in clinical practice: an audit review.
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Dec;38(6):291-3. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.046870.
9
When and how to treat patients who refuse treatment.
BMJ. 2014 Mar 25;348:g2043. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2043.
10
Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):477-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验