Suppr超能文献

错误识别、披露与报告:三种急诊医学提供者类型的实践模式

Error identification, disclosure, and reporting: practice patterns of three emergency medicine provider types.

作者信息

Hobgood Cherri, Xie Jipan, Weiner Bryan, Hooker James

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine (CH), The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;11(2):196-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To gather preliminary data on how the three major types of emergency medicine (EM) providers, physicians, nurses (RNs), and out-of-hospital personnel (EMTs), differ in error identification, disclosure, and reporting.

METHODS

A convenience sample of emergency department (ED) providers completed a brief survey designed to evaluate error frequency, disclosure, and reporting practices as well as error-based discussion and educational activities.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen subjects participated: 41 EMTs (35%), 33 RNs (28%), and 42 physicians (36%). Forty-five percent of EMTs, 56% of RNs, and 21% of physicians identified no clinical errors during the preceding year. When errors were identified, physicians learned of them via dialogue with RNs (58%), patients (13%), pharmacy (35%), and attending physicians (35%). For known errors, all providers were equally unlikely to inform the team caring for the patient. Disclosure to patients was limited and varied by provider type (19% EMTs, 23% RNs, and 74% physicians). Disclosure education was rare, with <or=15% of any provider type receiving such instruction. Yet, 59% of physicians had observed another provider disclose an error to a patient. Error discussions are widespread, with all providers indicating they discussed their own as well as the errors of others.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that error identification, disclosure, and reporting challenge all members of the ED care delivery team. Provider-specific education and enhanced teamwork training will be required to further the transformation of the ED into a high-reliability organization.

摘要

目的

收集关于三类主要急诊医学(EM)提供者,即医生、护士(注册护士)和院外急救人员(急救医疗技术员)在错误识别、披露和报告方面差异的初步数据。

方法

对急诊科(ED)提供者进行便利抽样,他们完成了一项简短调查,旨在评估错误发生频率、披露和报告做法以及基于错误的讨论和教育活动。

结果

116名受试者参与:41名急救医疗技术员(35%)、33名注册护士(28%)和42名医生(36%)。45%的急救医疗技术员、56%的注册护士和21%的医生在前一年未识别出临床错误。当识别出错误时,医生通过与注册护士对话(58%)、患者(13%)、药房(35%)和主治医生(35%)得知这些错误。对于已知错误,所有提供者告知负责照顾患者团队的可能性相同。向患者披露错误的情况有限,且因提供者类型而异(急救医疗技术员为19%,注册护士为23%,医生为74%)。披露教育很少见,任何提供者类型中接受此类指导的比例≤15%。然而,59%的医生观察到另一名提供者向患者披露了错误。错误讨论很普遍,所有提供者都表示他们讨论过自己以及他人的错误。

结论

本研究表明,错误识别、披露和报告对急诊护理团队的所有成员都构成挑战。需要针对提供者的教育和加强团队合作培训,以推动急诊科向高可靠性组织转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验