• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量疾病管理结果:一项关于疾病自我管理与康复的临床医生和患者评定量表的心理测量学研究

Measuring illness management outcomes: a psychometric study of clinician and consumer rating scales for illness self management and recovery.

作者信息

Salyers Michelle P, Godfrey Jenna L, Mueser Kim T, Labriola Shauna

机构信息

ACT Center of Indiana, Roudebush VA Medical Center, 1481 W. 10th St. (11H), Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2007 Oct;43(5):459-80. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9087-6. Epub 2007 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-007-9087-6
PMID:17514504
Abstract

Psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scales (consumer and clinician versions), new 15-item instruments measuring illness self-management and pursuit of recovery goals, were evaluated in consumers with severe mental illness. Both versions had moderate internal consistency and high 2-week test-retest reliability. In addition, the consumer version was correlated with self-ratings of recovery and symptoms, and the clinician version was correlated with clinician ratings of community functioning, indicating convergent validity. The results suggest the IMR Scales have adequate psychometric properties and may be useful in treatment planning and assessing recovery in individuals with severe mental illness.

摘要

疾病管理与康复(IMR)量表(消费者版和临床医生版)是用于测量疾病自我管理和康复目标追求情况的新的15项工具,对患有严重精神疾病的消费者进行了心理测量学特性评估。两个版本都具有中等程度的内部一致性和较高的两周重测信度。此外,消费者版与康复和症状的自我评分相关,临床医生版与临床医生对社区功能的评分相关,表明具有收敛效度。结果表明,IMR量表具有足够的心理测量学特性,可能有助于严重精神疾病患者的治疗规划和康复评估。

相似文献

1
Measuring illness management outcomes: a psychometric study of clinician and consumer rating scales for illness self management and recovery.衡量疾病管理结果:一项关于疾病自我管理与康复的临床医生和患者评定量表的心理测量学研究
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Oct;43(5):459-80. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9087-6. Epub 2007 May 21.
2
Evaluation of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.评价精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的疾病管理和康复量表。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Nov;132(2-3):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
3
The psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery scale: client and clinician versions.疾病管理与康复量表的心理测量特性:患者版与临床医生版
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 15;160(2):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.013. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
4
Investigating the reliability and validity of the Dutch versions of the illness management and recovery scales among clients with mental disorders.调查精神障碍患者使用荷兰语版疾病管理和康复量表的信度和效度。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):489-495. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124398. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Development and reliability of a measure of clinician competence in providing illness management and recovery.提供疾病管理和康复服务的临床医生能力测量工具的开发和可靠性研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):772-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100144.
6
Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals.客户优势、兴趣和目标评估的进一步验证。
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jan 1;66(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00496-6.
7
An Assessment of the 10-Item Mental Health Recovery Measure in a Predominantly African American Sample of Adults with Serious Mental Illness.一项针对主要为非裔美国成年人的严重精神疾病患者的 10 项心理健康康复测量的评估。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep;93(3):849-860. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09995-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Rasch analysis of the illness management and recovery scale-clinician version.疾病管理与康复量表临床版的拉施分析
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):383-9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12140. Epub 2014 May 10.
9
The psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery scale in a large American public mental health system.在一个大型美国公共精神卫生系统中,疾病管理和康复量表的心理测量学特性。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Oct 30;199(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
10
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Illness (self) management, clinical and functional recovery as determinants of personal recovery in people with severe mental illnesses: A mediation analysis.疾病(自身)管理、临床和功能恢复是严重精神疾病患者个人康复的决定因素:中介分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 26;19(11):e0313202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313202. eCollection 2024.
2
Building on Recovery: Embracing Community Inclusion in Mental Health Policies and Services.在康复的基础上:在心理健康政策和服务中拥抱社区包容。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Nov;60(8):1571-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01309-z. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
3
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale: A Systematic Review Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).

本文引用的文献

1
The Illness Management and Recovery program: rationale, development, and preliminary findings.疾病管理与康复计划:基本原理、制定过程及初步研究结果
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S32-43. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl022. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
2
Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications.精神分裂症康复的科学模型与消费者模型:一致性、对比及启示
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jul;32(3):432-42. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj044. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
3
An exploratory analysis of correlates of recovery.
评估疾病管理与康复量表的心理测量特性:一项使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)的系统评价
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;14(4):340. doi: 10.3390/bs14040340.
4
The Relationship of Functioning and Life Satisfaction with Illness Management and Recovery in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.双相障碍患者的功能和生活满意度与疾病管理和康复的关系:一项横断面研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Aug;60(6):1191-1202. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01270-x. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
5
Participants' Evaluation and Outcomes following Integration of Self-Management Support into Outpatient Schizophrenia Case Management.参与者在门诊精神分裂症病例管理中整合自我管理支持后的评估和结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043035.
6
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Utility of Peer-supported Ecological Momentary Assessment Among People with Serious Mental Illness: a Pilot Study.严重精神疾病患者的同伴支持生态瞬时评估的可行性、可接受性和潜在效用:一项试点研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep;93(3):717-735. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09986-3. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
7
A Smartphone-Based Self-management Intervention for Individuals With Bipolar Disorder (LiveWell): Empirical and Theoretical Framework, Intervention Design, and Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对双相情感障碍患者的基于智能手机的自我管理干预措施(“活得健康”):随机对照试验的实证与理论框架、干预设计及研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 21;11(2):e30710. doi: 10.2196/30710.
8
Assessing a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness.评估针对严重精神疾病成人的数字同伴支持自我管理干预措施:可行性、可接受性和初步效果。
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):833-841. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022619. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
9
Effects of Illness Management and Recovery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.疾病管理与康复的效果:一项多中心随机对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 14;12:723435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723435. eCollection 2021.
10
Social determinants of health and depression in adults presenting to the emergency department: Implications for family medicine.成年人就诊于急诊科的健康社会决定因素与抑郁:对家庭医学的启示。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Dec;67(12):e337-e347. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6712e337.
恢复相关因素的探索性分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 May;55(5):540-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.5.540.
4
Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness.为重度精神疾病患者实施循证实践。
Behav Modif. 2003 Jul;27(3):387-411. doi: 10.1177/0145445503027003007.
5
Illness management and recovery: a review of the research.疾病管理与康复:研究综述
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Oct;53(10):1272-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.10.1272.
6
Does competitive employment improve nonvocational outcomes for people with severe mental illness?竞争性就业能否改善重度精神疾病患者的非职业性结局?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):489-501. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.489.
7
Restorying psychiatric disability: learning from first person recovery narratives.重塑精神疾病致残经历:从个人康复叙事中学习
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001 Spring;24(4):335-43. doi: 10.1037/h0095071.
8
A test of the reliability and validity of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale.《马尔特诺马社区能力量表》的信效度检验。
Community Ment Health J. 2001 Apr;37(2):157-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1002713816110.
9
Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings.在常规心理健康服务环境中实施循证实践。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Feb;52(2):179-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.179.
10
What recovery means to us: consumers' perspectives.康复对我们意味着什么:消费者的观点。
Community Ment Health J. 2000 Jun;36(3):315-28. doi: 10.1023/a:1001917516869.