• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个大型美国公共精神卫生系统中,疾病管理和康复量表的心理测量学特性。

The psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery scale in a large American public mental health system.

机构信息

San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 9500 Gilman Drive #0994, San Diego, CA 92093-0994, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2012 Oct 30;199(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.013
PMID:22503383
Abstract

The Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) scale was created to measure recovery outcomes produced by the IMR program. However, many other mental health care programs are now designed to impact recovery-oriented outcomes, and the IMR has been identified as a potentially valuable measure of recovery-oriented mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and structural validity of the IMR clinician scale within a variety of therapeutic modalities other than IMR in a large multiethnic sample (N=10,659) of clients with mental illness from a large U.S. county mental health system. Clients completed the IMR on a single occasion. Our estimates of internal consistency were stronger than those found in previous studies (α=0.82). The scale also related to other measures of theoretically similar constructs, supporting construct and criterion validity claims. Additionally, confirmatory factor analyses supported the multidimensional representation of the IMR clinician scale. The three-factor model of illness self-management and recovery was represented by dimensions of recovery, management, and substance use. These reliable psychometric properties support the use of both the original one-factor and revised three-factor models to assess illness self-management and recovery among a broad spectrum of clients with mental illness.

摘要

疾病管理和康复 (IMR) 量表是为了衡量 IMR 项目产生的康复结果而创建的。然而,现在许多其他心理健康护理项目都旨在产生以康复为导向的结果,并且 IMR 已被确定为一种具有潜在价值的衡量以康复为导向的心理健康结果的方法。本研究的目的是在一个大型的多民族样本(N=10,659)中,检验 IMR 临床医生量表在 IMR 以外的各种治疗方式中的心理测量学特性和结构效度,这些客户来自美国一个大型县心理健康系统中的精神疾病患者。客户在单次就诊时完成了 IMR。我们对内部一致性的估计比以前的研究(α=0.82)更强。该量表还与其他具有理论相似结构的测量方法相关,支持了结构和标准效度的主张。此外,验证性因素分析支持 IMR 临床医生量表的多维表示。疾病自我管理和康复的三因素模型由康复、管理和物质使用维度表示。这些可靠的心理测量特性支持使用原始的单因素和修订的三因素模型来评估广泛的精神疾病患者的疾病自我管理和康复情况。

相似文献

1
The psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery scale in a large American public mental health system.在一个大型美国公共精神卫生系统中,疾病管理和康复量表的心理测量学特性。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Oct 30;199(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
2
The psychometric properties of the Illness Management and Recovery scale: client and clinician versions.疾病管理与康复量表的心理测量特性:患者版与临床医生版
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 15;160(2):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.013. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
3
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
4
Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample.使用澳大利亚样本检验康复评估量表的有效性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 May;41(5):450-7. doi: 10.1080/00048670701264792.
5
Assessing recovery of people with serious mental illness: development of a new scale.评估严重精神疾病患者的康复情况:新量表的制定。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jan;63(1):48-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100109.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the mental health recovery measure (MHRM).心理健康康复措施(MHRM)荷兰语版的心理计量学评估。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;60(2):162-8. doi: 10.1177/0020764012472302. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
7
Development and reliability of a measure of clinician competence in providing illness management and recovery.提供疾病管理和康复服务的临床医生能力测量工具的开发和可靠性研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):772-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100144.
8
Mental health recovery for psychiatric inpatient services: perceived importance of the elements of recovery.精神科住院服务中的心理健康康复:康复要素的感知重要性
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;22(2):39-48.
9
Psychometric properties of three instruments to measure recovery.用于测量康复情况的三种工具的心理测量特性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Sep;26(3):607-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00957.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
10
Comparative impact of professional mental health background on ratings of consumer outcome and fidelity in an Illness Management and Recovery program.专业心理健康背景对疾病管理和康复计划中消费者结果和保真度评分的影响比较。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):236-42. doi: 10.1037/prj0000026. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
PeerTECH: a randomized controlled trial of a peer-led mobile health intervention to improve medical and psychiatric self-management for persons with serious mental illness.同伴技术:一项随机对照试验,该试验采用由同伴主导的移动健康干预措施,以改善严重精神疾病患者的医疗和精神自我管理。
Mhealth. 2025 Jun 30;11:28. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-64. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Recovery in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.心理健康康复的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项范围综述
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jul;61(5):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01426-9. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale: A Systematic Review Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).
评估疾病管理与康复量表的心理测量特性:一项使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)的系统评价
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;14(4):340. doi: 10.3390/bs14040340.
4
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Utility of Peer-supported Ecological Momentary Assessment Among People with Serious Mental Illness: a Pilot Study.严重精神疾病患者的同伴支持生态瞬时评估的可行性、可接受性和潜在效用:一项试点研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep;93(3):717-735. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09986-3. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
5
Assessing a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness.评估针对严重精神疾病成人的数字同伴支持自我管理干预措施:可行性、可接受性和初步效果。
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):833-841. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022619. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
Introspective accuracy for substance use across a year of treatment for first episode psychosis.首发精神病患者一年治疗期内物质使用情况的内省准确性
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 May 27;26:100200. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100200. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Discrepancy between experience and importance of recovery components in the symptomatic and recovery perceptions of people with severe mental disorders.重度精神障碍患者在症状体验与康复认知中,康复要素的体验与重要性之间存在差异。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 31;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03287-y.
8
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of interpersonal community psychiatric treatment (ICPT) for people with long-term severe non-psychotic mental disorders: a multi-Centre randomized controlled trial.人际社区精神治疗(ICPT)对长期严重非精神病性精神障碍患者的疗效和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 19;21(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03264-5.
9
Development of a cognitive behavioral therapy with integrated mindfulness for Latinx immigrants with co-occurring disorders: Analysis of intermediary outcomes.发展一种认知行为疗法,将正念融入其中,用于治疗同时患有障碍的拉丁裔移民:中介结果分析。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Nov;12(8):825-835. doi: 10.1037/tra0000949. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
"The Italian Study on Recovery 2" Phase 1: Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), Italian Validation of the Recovery Assessment Scale.“意大利康复研究2” 第一阶段:康复评估量表(RAS)的心理测量特性,康复评估量表的意大利语验证
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 5;10:1000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01000. eCollection 2019.