Estabrooks Carole A, Kenny Deborah J, Adewale Adeniyi J, Cummings Greta G, Mallidou Anastasia A
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Jun;30(3):282-96. doi: 10.1002/nur.20218.
Researchers and theorists working in the field of knowledge translation point to the importance of organizational context in influencing research utilization. The study purpose was to compare research utilization in two different healthcare contexts--Canadian civilian and United States (US) Army settings. Contrary to the investigators' expectations, research utilization scores were lower in US Army settings, after controlling for potential predictors. In-service attendance, library access, belief suspension, gender, and years of experience interacted significantly with the setting (military or civilian) for research utilization. Predictors of research utilization common to both settings were attitude and belief suspension. Predictors in the US Army setting were trust and years of experience, and in the Canadian civilian setting were in-service attendance, time (organizational), research champion, and library access. While context is of central importance, individual and organizational predictors interact with context in important although not well-understood ways, and should not be ignored.
从事知识转化领域的研究人员和理论家指出组织环境在影响研究应用方面的重要性。本研究的目的是比较两种不同医疗环境下的研究应用情况——加拿大平民医疗环境和美国军队医疗环境。与研究人员的预期相反,在控制了潜在预测因素后,美国军队医疗环境中的研究应用得分较低。在职出勤率、图书馆使用情况、信念悬置、性别以及工作年限与研究应用的环境(军事或平民)之间存在显著的交互作用。两种环境下研究应用的共同预测因素是态度和信念悬置。美国军队医疗环境下的预测因素是信任和工作年限,而加拿大平民医疗环境下的预测因素是在职出勤率、时间(组织方面)、研究倡导者以及图书馆使用情况。虽然环境至关重要,但个体和组织预测因素以重要但尚未被充分理解的方式与环境相互作用,不应被忽视。