Lee Alex C H, Haddad Munther J, Hanna George B
Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2086-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9311-z. Epub 2007 May 22.
The widespread availability of adult minimal access surgical (MAS) equipment together with resource constraints have led pediatric surgeons to adopt the adult setup. This study examined the influence of instrument size on task outcome and physical impact on the surgeon in pediatric endoscopic intracorporeal knot tying.
Sixteen surgeons participated in this study in which they had to tie surgeon's knots inside a neonatal simulator box with an endoscopic field of 40 mm. All surgeons tied 20 knots using paired pediatric needle-holders and 20 knots using paired adult needle-holders in a randomized order. Knot quality score (KQS) and wrap length were used as indices of knot quality and wrap tightness. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the upper limb muscle groups were used to indicate muscular recruitment. A questionnaire on discomfort and instrument preference was also completed by the surgeons.
A total of 640 knots were analyzed. Median time was shorter for pediatric needle-holders than for adult needle-holders (94 s vs. 103 s; p < 0.001); however, KQS (0.271 vs. 0.260; p = 0.509) and the tightness around the tube (86 mm vs. 86 mm; p = 0.255) were not significantly different. The proportion of knots that completely slipped was also similar for both needle-holders (19% vs. 22%; p = 0.322). The normalized EMG values when using adult needle-holders were significantly higher than when using pediatric needle-holders in all upper limb muscle groups with the exception of left forearm extensors (p = 0.460). The surgeons reported less discomfort with the pediatric needle-holders in the right forearm and hand, and 13 surgeons expressed overall preference for the smaller instruments.
Endoscopic knot tying was performed faster in the neonatal simulator box using pediatric needle-holders while maintaining knot quality. Upper limb muscular recruitment was reduced resulting in less discomfort for the surgeon.
成人微创外科(MAS)设备的广泛可得性以及资源限制促使小儿外科医生采用成人设备。本研究探讨了器械尺寸对小儿内镜体内打结任务结果的影响以及对外科医生身体的影响。
16名外科医生参与了本研究,他们必须在一个内镜视野为40毫米的新生儿模拟器箱内打外科结。所有外科医生以随机顺序使用配对的小儿持针器打20个结,并使用配对的成人持针器打20个结。结质量评分(KQS)和缠绕长度用作结质量和缠绕紧密度的指标。上肢肌肉群的肌电图(EMG)记录用于指示肌肉募集情况。外科医生还完成了一份关于不适和器械偏好的问卷。
共分析了640个结。小儿持针器的中位时间比成人持针器短(94秒对103秒;p<0.001);然而,KQS(0.271对0.260;p = 0.509)和管子周围的紧密度(86毫米对86毫米;p = 0.255)没有显著差异。两种持针器完全滑结的比例也相似(19%对22%;p = 0.322)。除左前臂伸肌外,使用成人持针器时所有上肢肌肉群的标准化EMG值均显著高于使用小儿持针器时(p = 0.460)。外科医生报告说,使用小儿持针器时右前臂和手部的不适感较轻,13名外科医生表示总体上更喜欢较小的器械。
在新生儿模拟器箱中使用小儿持针器进行内镜打结时速度更快,同时保持结的质量。上肢肌肉募集减少,外科医生的不适感减轻。