Bonanno George A, Neria Yuval, Mancini Anthony, Coifman Karin G, Litz Brett, Insel Beverly
Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 May;116(2):342-51. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.342.
There is growing interest in complicated grief reactions as a possible new diagnostic category for inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. However, no research has yet shown that complicated grief has incremental validity (i.e., predicts unique variance in functioning). The authors addressed this issue in 2 studies by comparing grief, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms with different measures of functioning (interviewer ratings, friend ratings, self-report, and autonomic arousal). The 1st study (N = 73) used longitudinal data collected at 4 and 18 months postloss, and the 2nd study (N = 447) used cross-sectional data collected 2.5-3.5 years postloss. With depression and PTSD controlled, grief emerged as a unique predictor of functioning, both cross-sectionally and prospectively. The findings provide convergent support for the incremental validity of complicated grief as an independent marker of bereavement-related psychopathology.
作为一种可能纳入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》的新诊断类别,复杂悲伤反应越来越受到关注。然而,尚无研究表明复杂悲伤具有增量效度(即预测功能的独特差异)。作者在两项研究中探讨了这一问题,他们将悲伤、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状与不同的功能测量方法(访谈者评分、朋友评分、自我报告和自主唤醒)进行了比较。第一项研究(N = 73)使用了丧亲后4个月和18个月收集的纵向数据,第二项研究(N = 447)使用了丧亲后2.5 - 3.5年收集的横断面数据。在控制了抑郁和PTSD后,悲伤在横断面和前瞻性研究中均成为功能的独特预测因素。这些发现为复杂悲伤作为丧亲相关精神病理学的独立标志物的增量效度提供了一致的支持。