• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受试者对美学治疗需求的认知与专业评估之间关系的评估。

Evaluation of the relationship between subjects' perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs.

作者信息

Tortopidis Dimitrios, Hatzikyriakos Andreas, Kokoti Maria, Menexes George, Tsiggos Nikolaos

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthesis and Implant Prosthodontics, Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(3):154-62; discussion 163. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00089.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00089.x
PMID:17518906
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of the present study were to (1) evaluate the esthetic dental treatment need by means of two special questionnaires, (2) determine the reliability and the construct validity of the measurement scales derived from these questionnaires, and (3) investigate the relationship between Greek subjects' perception and a professional examiner's assessment regarding the esthetic treatment need.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants in this survey consisted of 132 subjects (48 males with mean age 39.0 +/- 14.5 years old, 84 females with mean age 41.7 +/- 14.5 years old) with natural teeth and fixed restorations. Subjects were asked to complete a special self-evaluation questionnaire consisting of 12 items. During the next stage, all participants were clinically examined by an experienced examiner and the data collected were used to fill out a second special professional assessment questionnaire consisting of 20 items. The forms structure used were in accordance with well-established indices used in orthodontics for assessing esthetic treatment need.

RESULTS

The reliability of the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) analysis-derived scales was very satisfactory (Cronbach's a coefficient: a =0.82) for the total scale of the self-evaluation measurement. For the professional assessment scale, the reliability of the total scale was almost perfect (a=0.92). The MCA revealed one reliable factorial construct for the self-evaluation measurement scale and two reliable constructs for the professional measurement scale. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a very low agreement between self-evaluation and professional measurement scales.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this survey suggest that there was a relative disagreement between subjects' perception and professional assessment regarding the need for esthetic dental treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In the present survey, the agreement between subjects' perception and clinical assessment of esthetic dental treatment need was found to be very low, which highlighted the discrepancies between patients' and dentists' perceptions of esthetic needs.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)通过两份特殊问卷评估牙齿美容治疗需求;(2)确定从这些问卷得出的测量量表的信度和结构效度;(3)研究希腊受试者对美容治疗需求的认知与专业检查者评估之间的关系。

材料与方法

本调查的参与者包括132名有天然牙和固定修复体的受试者(48名男性,平均年龄39.0±14.5岁;84名女性,平均年龄41.7±14.5岁)。受试者被要求完成一份由12项内容组成的特殊自我评估问卷。在下一阶段,所有参与者由一名经验丰富的检查者进行临床检查,收集的数据用于填写一份由20项内容组成的第二份特殊专业评估问卷。所使用的表格结构符合正畸学中用于评估美容治疗需求的既定指标。

结果

多重对应分析(MCA)得出的量表在自我评估测量总量表方面的信度非常令人满意(Cronbach's α系数:α=0.82)。对于专业评估量表,总量表的信度几乎完美(α=0.92)。MCA显示自我评估测量量表有一个可靠的因子结构,专业测量量表有两个可靠的结构。Pearson相关系数表明自我评估量表和专业测量量表之间的一致性非常低。

结论

本次调查结果表明,受试者对牙齿美容治疗需求的认知与专业评估之间存在相对差异。临床意义 在本次调查中,发现受试者对牙齿美容治疗需求的认知与临床评估之间的一致性非常低,这突出了患者和牙医对美容需求认知之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the relationship between subjects' perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs.受试者对美学治疗需求的认知与专业评估之间关系的评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(3):154-62; discussion 163. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00089.x.
2
Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics.牙齿美学满意度、为改善美学效果而接受和期望的牙科治疗。
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):195-200. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52902.
3
Clinical assessments and patient evaluations of the esthetic quality of maxillary anterior restorations.上颌前牙修复体美学质量的临床评估与患者评价
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):65-71.
4
Arabic version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index.老年口腔健康评估指数阿拉伯语版本。
Gerodontology. 2008 Mar;25(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00195.x. Epub 2008 Jan 13.
5
[Aestetic dental treatment in present socio-economic conditions and its influence on the oral hygiene and self--esteem of patients based on the survey and clinical research].[当前社会经济条件下的美学牙科治疗及其基于调查和临床研究对患者口腔卫生和自尊的影响]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2007;53(2):100-13.
6
Psychometric evaluation of Self-Assessed Support Needs of women with breast cancer Scale.乳腺癌患者自我评估支持需求量表的心理测量学评价
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01825.x.
7
Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.牙间隙有关系吗?自我评估的评价:一项试点研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Nov;34(11):814-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01778.x.
8
Development of a 32-item scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.开发一个32项量表以评估上消化道癌切除术后的功能障碍。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1440-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02179.x.
9
Attitudes and problems faced by both patients and dentists in esthetic dentistry today: an AAED membership survey.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(3):164-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00091.x.
10
A study of dentists' preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions.一项关于牙医偏好的上颌前牙宽度比例的研究:将反复出现的美观牙齿比例与其他数学比例和自然比例进行比较。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):324-37; discussion 338-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00114.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychosocial Impact on Gingival Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIGAQ): The Effect of Sociodemographic Variables on Results in a Spanish Adult Population. An Observational and Cross-Sectional Study.心理社会因素对牙龈美学影响问卷(PIGAQ):社会人口统计学变量对西班牙成年人群结果的影响。一项观察性横断面研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jul;37(7):1655-1666. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13449. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
2
General dentists' treatment plans in response to cosmetic complains; a field study using unannounced-standardized-patient.普通牙医针对美容诉求制定的治疗方案;一项使用未事先通知的标准化患者的实地研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 20;10(19):e38205. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38205. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
3
The knowledge regarding the impacts and management of black triangles among dental professionals and laypeople.
牙科专业人士和非专业人士对黑三角的影响和管理的认识。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 12;14(1):10840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61356-0.
4
Evaluating smile aesthetic satisfaction and related smile characteristics in dental students.评估牙科学生的微笑美学满意度及相关微笑特征。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Jan-Feb;14(1):92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
5
Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.不同社会和人口统计学地位的外行对口面部外观的感知。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239232. eCollection 2020.
6
The Ideals of Facial Beauty Among Chinese Aesthetic Practitioners: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人审美从业者对面部美的理想:一项大型全国调查的结果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):102-114. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1241-8. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
The opinion of children and their parents about four different types of dental restorations in a public health service in Brazil.巴西公共卫生服务中儿童及其父母对四种不同类型牙齿修复体的看法。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017 Feb;18(1):25-29. doi: 10.1007/s40368-016-0262-8. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
8
Influence of Gender on the Patient's Assessment of Restorations on the Upper Anterior Teeth.性别对患者对上颌前牙修复体评价的影响。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014 Mar;48(1):33-41. doi: 10.15644/asc48/1/4.
9
Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale.义齿美学量表的反应性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Apr;21(3):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter whitening strips as compared to home-whitening with 10 % carbamide peroxide gel--systematic review of RCTs and metanalysis.非处方美白牙贴与10%过氧化脲凝胶家庭美白效果的对比——随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jan;20(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1547-8. Epub 2015 Aug 7.