Maciel R, Salvador D, Azoubel K, Redivivo R, Maciel C, da Franca C, Amerongen E, Colares V
Paediatric Dentistry Department, Dental School, University of Pernambuco, 147. Sala 603. Boa Vista., Recife, Pernambuco, CEP 50050-100, Brazil.
University Universo, Goiânia, Brazil.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017 Feb;18(1):25-29. doi: 10.1007/s40368-016-0262-8. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
To investigate the opinion of children and their parents of four different types of restoration placed in primary molars.
A mixed method study in which both children and their parents were involved. In the quantitative study, children and parents gave their opinion using a face scale about four different types of restoration immediately after placement, evaluating how satisfied they were. In the qualitative part, children and their parents were interviewed to report their preference among the four types of restoration using dental models and photos.
In the quantitative study, 1045 restorations were placed, being conventional restorations (198 with amalgam and 205 with composite resin) and atraumatic interventions [408 with glass ionomer: ART, atraumatic restorative treatment, and 234 with preformed metal crowns (PMCs): Hall technique]. Almost all participants (children and parents) gave a positive opinion (from 94.9 to 100%) on the four types of restoration placed in the children's teeth. There was no statistical significant difference in opinion in terms of acceptance of the four types of restoration placed (Chi square test, p value > 0.05). In the qualitative approach, 18 children and 11 parents were interviewed. If they could choose, children (16/18) preferred the PMCs, while parents (10/11) preferred aesthetic materials such as composite resin and glass ionomer cement.
A high degree of satisfaction was observed with children and their parents in the four types of restoration after placement. However, if it could be chosen in advance, children prefer the PMCs and parents a tooth-coloured material.
调查儿童及其父母对乳牙中四种不同类型修复体的看法。
一项涉及儿童及其父母的混合方法研究。在定量研究中，儿童和父母在修复体放置后立即使用面部量表对四种不同类型的修复体给出意见，评估他们的满意程度。在定性部分，通过使用牙模和照片对儿童及其父母进行访谈，以报告他们在四种修复体类型中的偏好。
在定量研究中，共放置了1045个修复体，包括传统修复体（198个汞合金修复体和205个复合树脂修复体）和非创伤性干预措施[408个玻璃离子体修复体：非创伤性修复治疗（ART），以及234个预成金属冠（PMC）：霍尔技术]。几乎所有参与者（儿童和父母）对儿童牙齿上放置的四种修复体都给出了积极的意见（从94.9%到100%）。在对放置的四种修复体的接受度方面，意见没有统计学上的显著差异（卡方检验，p值>0.05）。在定性研究中，采访了18名儿童和11名家长。如果可以选择，儿童（16/18）更喜欢预成金属冠，而家长（10/11）更喜欢复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀等美观材料。
观察到儿童及其父母对放置后的四种修复体满意度较高。然而，如果可以提前选择，儿童更喜欢预成金属冠，而家长更喜欢牙齿颜色的材料。
