Suppr超能文献

旅行者疟疾化学预防中的争议与误解

Controversies and misconceptions in malaria chemoprophylaxis for travelers.

作者信息

Chen Lin H, Wilson Mary E, Schlagenhauf Patricia

机构信息

Travel Medicine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA 02238, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2007 May 23;297(20):2251-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.20.2251.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Controversies in malaria prevention arise from the absence of data, conflicting data between different studies, conflicting recommendations, deviation of local practice from scientific data, and varying risk thresholds. Misconceptions about the seriousness of malaria, the tolerability of chemoprophylaxis drugs, and the efficacy and safety of repellents contribute to the controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare several national guidelines on malaria chemoprophylaxis to identify variations in recommendations. We reviewed studies on tolerability of mefloquine with particular focus on its neuropsychiatric adverse effects and influence on performance. We also describe why most recommended chemoprophylactic regimens fail to prevent relapses of Plasmodium vivax malaria and review available options.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched scientific publications in MEDLINE via PubMED for relevant articles with a cutoff date of December 2006 using the search terms malaria, chemoprophylaxis, travel, mefloquine, neuropsychiatric adverse events, tolerability, vivax malaria, and primaquine. Additional references were obtained from bibliographies of the selected articles. There were no language restrictions.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Gaps and conflicts exist among current guidelines. Health authorities vary in the chemoprophylaxis drugs they recommend, the indications for continuous prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis, and the use of standby emergency treatment. Despite widespread reports on the adverse effects of mefloquine, controlled studies found that serious neuropsychiatric adverse events occur at rates comparable with or lower than other chemoprophylaxis drugs. Moreover, mefloquine does not appear to impair performance while driving, flying, or diving. Vivax malaria causes significant illness in travelers, but current first-line chemoprophylaxis agents do not prevent relapses of vivax malaria. Although not licensed in most countries as primary prophylaxis, primaquine effectively prevents relapses of vivax malaria.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of malaria in travelers requires detailed knowledge of malaria epidemiology and host-vector-parasite interactions. Decisions are complicated by a lack of standardized recommendations, controversies, and misconceptions. Improved international consensus is indicated to minimize conflicting guidelines, clarify controversies, and promote adherence to preventive measures.

摘要

背景

疟疾预防方面的争议源于缺乏数据、不同研究之间相互矛盾的数据、相互冲突的建议、当地实际做法与科学数据的偏差以及不同的风险阈值。对疟疾严重性、化学预防药物耐受性以及驱虫剂功效和安全性的误解也加剧了这些争议。

目的

比较若干国家关于疟疾化学预防的指南,以确定建议中的差异。我们回顾了关于甲氟喹耐受性的研究,特别关注其神经精神方面的不良反应及其对行为能力的影响。我们还阐述了为何大多数推荐的化学预防方案无法预防间日疟原虫疟疾的复发,并综述了可用的选择。

证据获取

我们通过PubMed在MEDLINE中检索科学出版物,以查找截止到2006年12月的相关文章,检索词为疟疾、化学预防、旅行、甲氟喹、神经精神不良事件、耐受性、间日疟原虫疟疾和伯氨喹。从所选文章的参考文献中获取了其他参考文献。没有语言限制。

证据综合

当前指南中存在差距和冲突。卫生当局在推荐的化学预防药物、持续预防与不预防的指征以及备用紧急治疗的使用方面存在差异。尽管有大量关于甲氟喹不良反应的报道,但对照研究发现,严重神经精神不良事件的发生率与其他化学预防药物相当或更低。此外,甲氟喹在驾驶、飞行或潜水时似乎不会损害行为能力。间日疟原虫疟疾会给旅行者带来严重疾病,但目前的一线化学预防药物无法预防间日疟原虫疟疾的复发。尽管伯氨喹在大多数国家未被批准作为主要预防药物,但它能有效预防间日疟原虫疟疾的复发。

结论

旅行者疟疾的预防需要详细了解疟疾流行病学以及宿主-媒介-寄生虫相互作用。由于缺乏标准化建议、存在争议和误解,决策变得复杂。需要加强国际共识,以尽量减少相互冲突的指南,澄清争议,并促进对预防措施的遵守。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验