Suppr超能文献

缬沙坦与赖诺普利或缓释美托洛尔在预防高血压患者心血管和肾脏事件中的比较

Valsartan versus lisinopril or extended-release metoprolol in preventing cardiovascular and renal events in patients with hypertension.

作者信息

Delea Thomas E, Taneja Charu, Moynahan Aaron, Thomas Simu K, Frech-Tamas Feride, Oster Gerry

机构信息

Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA 02245, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jun 1;64(11):1187-96. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060380.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare cardiovascular and renal events in patients with hypertension receiving the angiotensin II-receptor blocker valsartan versus those receiving the angiotensin-converting-enzyme lisinopril or the beta-blocker metoprolol succinate in an extended-release formulation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using a health insurance claims database spanning the period from January 1997 through December 2003 and representing approximately 40 million members enrolled in over 70 health plans across the United States. Study subjects included all persons in the database with two or more outpatient prescriptions for valsartan, lisinopril, or extended-release metoprolol and two or more prior claims with a diagnosis of hypertension. Those with a history of major cardiovascular or renal events (diagnosis of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, or cardiac arrest; coronary revascularization procedure; diagnosis of renal failure; or dialysis or kidney transplantation) or using other antihypertensive medications except diuretics during the 12 months before treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, or extended-release metoprolol were excluded. Risks of major cardiovascular or renal event during follow-up were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 29,357 antihypertensive patients were identified who initiated therapy with valsartan (n = 6,645), lisinopril (n = 17,320), or extended-release metoprolol (n = 5,392). In multivariate analyses, therapy with valsartan was associated with a significantly lower risk of a major cardiovascular or renal event versus extended-release metoprolol (heart rate [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.87; p = 0.0015). Patients receiving valsartan had a nominally lower risk of a major cardiovascular or renal event than those receiving lisinopril, although this difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.07; p = 0.1987).

CONCLUSION

Results of this observational study suggest that the use of valsartan may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular and renal events compared with extended-release metoprolol.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较接受血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂缬沙坦治疗的高血压患者与接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利或缓释剂型的β受体阻滞剂美托洛尔琥珀酸盐治疗的患者发生心血管和肾脏事件的情况。

方法

进行了一项回顾性研究,使用了一个医疗保险理赔数据库,该数据库涵盖1997年1月至2003年12月期间,代表了美国70多个健康计划中约4000万参保人员。研究对象包括数据库中所有有两份或更多份缬沙坦、赖诺普利或缓释美托洛尔门诊处方且有两份或更多份先前诊断为高血压的理赔记录的人员。排除那些有重大心血管或肾脏事件史(心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭、室性心律失常或心脏骤停的诊断;冠状动脉血运重建手术;肾衰竭的诊断;或透析或肾脏移植)或在接受缬沙坦、赖诺普利或缓释美托洛尔治疗前12个月内使用除利尿剂以外的其他抗高血压药物的患者。使用Cox比例风险回归分析随访期间重大心血管或肾脏事件的风险。

结果

共识别出29357名开始使用缬沙坦(n = 6645)、赖诺普利(n = 17320)或缓释美托洛尔(n = 5392)进行治疗的抗高血压患者。在多变量分析中,与缓释美托洛尔相比,缬沙坦治疗与重大心血管或肾脏事件风险显著降低相关(心率[HR],0.70;95%置信区间[CI],0.56 - 0.87;p = 0.0015)。接受缬沙坦治疗的患者发生重大心血管或肾脏事件的风险名义上低于接受赖诺普利治疗的患者,尽管这种差异无统计学意义(HR,0.89;95% CI,0.74 - 1.07;p = 0.1987)。

结论

这项观察性研究的结果表明,与缓释美托洛尔相比,使用缬沙坦可能降低重大心血管和肾脏事件的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验