Mujadzic Mirsad, Papanicolaou George, Young Henry, Tsai Tsu-Min
Louisville, Ky. From the Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2141-2147. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260703.56453.06.
Because of overlapping symptoms, carpal tunnel syndrome is sometimes diagnosed and a more proximal site of compression may be missed. Incomplete relief following carpal tunnel surgery may be caused by the failure to identify the second site of compression.
A retrospective review was performed on 61 patients who were diagnosed as having both carpal tunnel syndrome and pronator teres syndrome of the ipsilateral median nerve. Besides precise medical history and physical evaluation, nerve conduction velocity studies and electromyography were performed. All patients but two had ipsilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release and pronator teres release. Results after surgery were clinically assessed and evaluated as follows: complete relief, partial relief, or no relief.
Postoperative evaluation resulted in 39 of 61 patients (64 percent) experiencing complete relief. Thirteen patients (21 percent) had partial relief. Eight of these patients were secondarily diagnosed with more proximal compression. Five of them had thoracic outlet compression syndrome, and three of them had cervical radiculopathy. For five patients, no specific reason was found for experiencing only partial relief. Nine patients (15 percent) had no significant relief. Among those patients, four were diagnosed with thoracic outlet compression syndrome and two with cervical radiculopathy; for three patients, the authors found no specific reason for failure.
The main benefit of using this protocol in this selected group of patients is to shorten total morbidity time and to avoid exposure of the patient to two operations instead of one.
由于症状重叠,腕管综合征有时会被误诊,而更靠近近端的压迫部位可能被漏诊。腕管手术后缓解不完全可能是由于未能识别出第二个压迫部位。
对61例被诊断为同侧正中神经腕管综合征和旋前圆肌综合征的患者进行回顾性研究。除了详细的病史和体格检查外,还进行了神经传导速度研究和肌电图检查。除2例患者外,所有患者均接受了同侧内镜下腕管松解术和旋前圆肌松解术。术后结果进行临床评估,分为完全缓解、部分缓解或无缓解。
术后评估显示,61例患者中有39例(64%)完全缓解。13例患者(21%)部分缓解。其中8例患者继发诊断为更靠近近端的压迫。5例患有胸廓出口综合征,3例患有颈椎病神经根病。5例患者仅部分缓解但未发现具体原因。9例患者(15%)无明显缓解。在这些患者中,4例被诊断为胸廓出口综合征,2例患有颈椎病神经根病;3例患者未发现具体的失败原因。
在这组特定患者中使用该方案的主要益处在于缩短总发病时间,并避免患者接受两次手术而非一次手术。