Suppr超能文献

我们给用于食品生产的动物喂什么?动物饲料成分及其对人类健康潜在影响的综述。

What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health.

作者信息

Sapkota Amy R, Lefferts Lisa Y, McKenzie Shawn, Walker Polly

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2007 May;115(5):663-70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9760. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Animal feeding practices in the United States have changed considerably over the past century. As large-scale, concentrated production methods have become the predominant model for animal husbandry, animal feeds have been modified to include ingredients ranging from rendered animals and animal waste to antibiotics and organoarsenicals. In this article we review current U.S. animal feeding practices and etiologic agents that have been detected in animal feed. Evidence that current feeding practices may lead to adverse human health impacts is also evaluated.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed published veterinary and human-health literature regarding animal feeding practices, etiologic agents present in feed, and human health effects along with proceedings from animal feed workshops.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted from peer-reviewed articles and books identified using PubMed, Agricola, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention databases.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Findings emphasize that current animal feeding practices can result in the presence of bacteria, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, prions, arsenicals, and dioxins in feed and animal-based food products. Despite a range of potential human health impacts that could ensue, there are significant data gaps that prevent comprehensive assessments of human health risks associated with animal feed. Limited data are collected at the federal or state level concerning the amounts of specific ingredients used in animal feed, and there are insufficient surveillance systems to monitor etiologic agents "from farm to fork."

CONCLUSIONS

Increased funding for integrated veterinary and human health surveillance systems and increased collaboration among feed professionals, animal producers, and veterinary and public health officials is necessary to effectively address these issues.

摘要

目的

在过去的一个世纪里,美国的动物饲养方式发生了很大变化。随着大规模、集中化生产方式成为畜牧业的主要模式,动物饲料已被改良,纳入了从动物制品、动物粪便到抗生素和有机砷等各种成分。在本文中,我们回顾了美国当前的动物饲养方式以及在动物饲料中检测到的病原体。我们还评估了当前饲养方式可能对人类健康产生不利影响的证据。

数据来源

我们查阅了已发表的兽医和人类健康文献,内容涉及动物饲养方式、饲料中存在的病原体以及对人类健康的影响,同时还参考了动物饲料研讨会的会议记录。

数据提取

数据从使用PubMed、Agricola、美国农业部、食品药品监督管理局和疾病控制与预防中心数据库识别出的同行评审文章和书籍中提取。

数据综合

研究结果强调,当前的动物饲养方式可能导致饲料和动物性食品中存在细菌、抗生素耐药菌、朊病毒、砷化物和二噁英。尽管可能会产生一系列潜在的人类健康影响,但存在重大的数据缺口,妨碍了对与动物饲料相关的人类健康风险进行全面评估。联邦或州一级收集的关于动物饲料中特定成分用量的数据有限,而且缺乏足够的监测系统来监测从农场到餐桌的病原体。

结论

为了有效解决这些问题,有必要增加对兽医和人类健康综合监测系统的资金投入,并加强饲料专业人员、动物生产者以及兽医和公共卫生官员之间的合作。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Quantifying antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals in North America.量化北美食用动物中的抗菌素耐药性。
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 27;16:1542472. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472. eCollection 2025.
4
One Health: a holistic approach for food safety in livestock.同一健康:保障家畜食品安全的整体方法。
Sci One Health. 2023 May 10;1:100015. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100015. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

2
Fate of arsenic compounds in poultry litter upon land application.家禽粪便中砷化合物在土地施用后的归宿
Chemosphere. 2006 Dec;65(11):2028-34. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.065. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
10
Determination of mycotoxins in bovine milk by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.液相色谱串联质谱法测定牛乳中的霉菌毒素
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005 Jun 25;820(2):183-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.020. Epub 2005 Apr 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验