Kunkler Kevin
Immersion Medical Inc.
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Sep;2(3):203-10. doi: 10.1002/rcs.101.
Robotic surgery and medical simulation have much in common: both use a mechanized interface that provides visual "patient" reactions in response to the actions of the health care professional (although simulation also includes touch feedback); both use monitors to visualize the progression of the procedure; and both use computer software applications through which the health care professional interacts. Both technologies are experiencing rapid adoption and are viewed as modalities that allow physicians to perform increasingly complex minimally invasive procedures while enhancing patient safety. A review of the literature and industry developments concludes that medical simulators can be useful tools in determining a physician's understanding and use of best practices, management of patient complications, appropriate use of instruments and tools, and overall competence in performing procedures. Future use of these systems depends on their impact on patient safety, procedure completion time and cost efficiency. The sooner simulation training can be used to support developing technologies and procedures, the earlier, and typically the better, the results. Continued studies are needed to identify and ensure the ongoing applicability of these systems for both training and certification.
二者均使用机械化界面,该界面会根据医护人员的操作提供视觉上的“患者”反应(尽管模拟还包括触觉反馈);二者都使用监视器来可视化手术进程;二者都使用医护人员可通过其进行交互的计算机软件应用程序。这两种技术都在迅速得到应用,并被视为能让医生在提高患者安全性的同时实施日益复杂的微创手术的方式。对文献和行业发展的回顾得出结论,医学模拟器可成为确定医生对最佳实践的理解与运用、患者并发症管理、器械和工具的正确使用以及手术操作总体能力的有用工具。这些系统未来的应用取决于它们对患者安全、手术完成时间和成本效益的影响。模拟训练越早用于支持技术和手术的开发,结果通常就越早且越好。需要持续开展研究,以确定并确保这些系统在培训和认证方面的持续适用性。