• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广泛的内含子缺失表明古代顶复门生物中存在反转录转座子活性。

Widespread intron loss suggests retrotransposon activity in ancient apicomplexans.

作者信息

Roy Scott William, Penny David

机构信息

Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Sep;24(9):1926-33. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm102. Epub 2007 May 23.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msm102
PMID:17522085
Abstract

Several facets of spliceosomal intron in apicomplexans remain mysterious. First, intron numbers vary across species by 2 orders of magnitude, indicating massive intron loss and/or gain. Second, previous studies have shown very different evolutionary patterns over different timescales, with 100-fold higher rates of intron loss/gain between genera than within genera. Third, the timing and dynamics of nearly complete intron loss in Cryptosporidium species, as well as reasons for retention of the few remaining introns, remain unknown. We compared intron positions in 785 orthologous genes between 3 moderate to intron-rich apicomplexan species. We estimate that the Theileria-Plasmodium ancestor had 4.5 times as many introns as modern Plasmodium species and 38% more than modern Theileria species, and that subsequent intron losses have outnumbered intron gains by 5.8 to 1 in Theileria and by some 56 to 1 in Plasmodium. Several patterns suggest that these intron losses occurred by recombination with reverse-transcribed mRNAs. Intriguingly, this finding suggests significant retrotransposon activity in the lineages leading to both Theileria and Plasmodium, in contrast to the dearth of known retrotransposons and intron loss within modern species from both genera. We also compared genomes from Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis and found no evidence of ongoing intron loss, nor of intron gain. By contrast, Cryptosporidium introns are less evolutionary conserved with Toxoplasma than are introns from other apicomplexans; thus the few remaining introns are not simply indispensable ancestral introns.

摘要

顶复门生物中剪接体内含子的几个方面仍然很神秘。首先,内含子数量在不同物种间相差2个数量级,这表明存在大量内含子的丢失和/或获得。其次,先前的研究显示在不同时间尺度上有非常不同的进化模式,属间内含子丢失/获得的速率比属内高100倍。第三,隐孢子虫属物种中几乎完全的内含子丢失的时间和动态,以及少数剩余内含子得以保留的原因,仍然未知。我们比较了3个中等内含子丰富的顶复门物种中785个直系同源基因的内含子位置。我们估计泰勒虫属-疟原虫属的祖先拥有的内含子数量是现代疟原虫物种的4.5倍,比现代泰勒虫物种多38%,并且在泰勒虫属中随后的内含子丢失数量比内含子获得数量多5.8倍,在疟原虫属中约多56倍。几种模式表明这些内含子丢失是通过与逆转录的mRNA重组而发生的。有趣的是,这一发现表明在导致泰勒虫属和疟原虫属的谱系中有显著的逆转座子活性,这与这两个属现代物种中已知逆转座子的缺乏和内含子丢失形成对比。我们还比较了微小隐孢子虫和人隐孢子虫的基因组,没有发现正在发生内含子丢失或获得的证据。相比之下,隐孢子虫的内含子与弓形虫相比,进化保守性低于其他顶复门生物的内含子;因此,少数剩余的内含子并非仅仅是不可或缺的祖先内含子。

相似文献

1
Widespread intron loss suggests retrotransposon activity in ancient apicomplexans.广泛的内含子缺失表明古代顶复门生物中存在反转录转座子活性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Sep;24(9):1926-33. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm102. Epub 2007 May 23.
2
Patterns of intron loss and gain in plants: intron loss-dominated evolution and genome-wide comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana.植物内含子丢失与获得的模式:以内含子丢失为主导的进化以及水稻和拟南芥的全基因组比较
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jan;24(1):171-81. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl159. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
3
The evolution of spliceosomal introns in alveolates.纤毛虫类中剪接体内含子的进化
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 May;24(5):1093-6. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm037. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
4
Investigation of loss and gain of introns in the compact genomes of pufferfishes (Fugu and Tetraodon).河豚(河鲀属和四齿鲀属)紧凑基因组中内含子的缺失与获得研究。
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Mar;25(3):526-35. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm278. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
5
A very high fraction of unique intron positions in the intron-rich diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana indicates widespread intron gain.在富含内含子的硅藻假微型海链藻中,极高比例的独特内含子位置表明存在广泛的内含子获得现象。
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jul;24(7):1447-57. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm048. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
6
Large-scale intron conservation and order-of-magnitude variation in intron loss/gain rates in apicomplexan evolution.顶复门生物进化过程中内含子的大规模保守性以及内含子丢失/获得速率的数量级变化
Genome Res. 2006 Oct;16(10):1270-5. doi: 10.1101/gr.5410606. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
7
On the incidence of intron loss and gain in paralogous gene families.关于旁系同源基因家族中内含子丢失和获得的发生率
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1579-81. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm082. Epub 2007 Apr 29.
8
Repeated secondary loss of adaptin complex genes in the Apicomplexa.顶复门生物中衔接蛋白复合体基因的反复次生缺失。
Parasitol Int. 2009 Mar;58(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.12.002. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
9
Formation of new genes explains lower intron density in mammalian Rhodopsin G protein-coupled receptors.新基因的形成解释了哺乳动物视紫红质G蛋白偶联受体中较低的内含子密度。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Jun;43(3):864-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.007. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
10
Intron-rich ancestors.富含内含子的祖先。
Trends Genet. 2006 Sep;22(9):468-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Deletion of splicing factor Cdc5 in Toxoplasma disrupts transcriptome integrity, induces abortive bradyzoite formation, and prevents acute infection in mice.弓形虫中剪接因子Cdc5的缺失破坏了转录组完整性,诱导了流产型缓殖子的形成,并阻止了小鼠的急性感染。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 22;16(1):3769. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58805-3.
2
Deciphering the code of resistance: a genomic and transcriptomic exploration of the Cystoisospora suis Holland-I strain.破解抗性密码:猪等孢球虫荷兰-I株的基因组和转录组学探索
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89372-8.
3
Intron losses and gains in the nematodes.
线虫中的内含子丢失和获得。
Biol Direct. 2022 Jun 5;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13062-022-00328-8.
4
Transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression of the invasive avian malaria parasite in Hawai'i.夏威夷入侵性禽疟原虫的转录组组装与差异基因表达
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 27;11(9):4935-4944. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7401. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Sense-antisense gene overlap is probably a cause for retaining the few introns in Giardia genome and the implications.感-反义基因重叠可能是导致贾第虫基因组保留少数内含子的原因及其影响。
Biol Direct. 2018 Oct 17;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13062-018-0226-5.
6
Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants.不精确的内含子丢失比精确的内含子丢失频率更低,但在植物中并不罕见。
Biol Direct. 2015 May 27;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7.
7
Reverse transcriptase and intron number evolution.逆转录酶与内含子数量的进化。
Stem Cell Investig. 2014 Sep 28;1:17. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2306-9759.2014.08.01. eCollection 2014.
8
Evaluation of the mechanisms of intron loss and gain in the social amoebae Dictyostelium.对社会性变形虫盘基网柄菌内含子丢失和获得机制的评估。
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Dec 18;15:286. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0567-y.
9
The genome of Eimeria falciformis--reduction and specialization in a single host apicomplexan parasite.镰形艾美耳球虫的基因组——单一宿主顶复门寄生虫的基因缩减与特化
BMC Genomics. 2014 Aug 20;15(1):696. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-696.
10
The Cryptosporidium parvum ApiAP2 gene family: insights into the evolution of apicomplexan AP2 regulatory systems.微小隐孢子虫ApiAP2基因家族:对顶复门AP2调控系统进化的见解
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(13):8271-84. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku500. Epub 2014 Jun 23.