Chang F K, Chen M L, Cheng S F, Shih T S, Mao I F
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Nov;64(11):759-62. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029199. Epub 2007 May 23.
To determine the effectiveness of protective suits and gloves by biomonitoring.
Fifteen male spray painters at a ship coating factory were studied for two weeks. Workers wore no protective clothing during the first week and wore protective suits and gloves during the second week. Sampling was conducted on four consecutive working days each week. Ethyl benzene and xylene in the air were collected by using 3M 3500 organic vapour monitors. Urine was collected before and after each work shift.
Urinary mandelic acid (MA) and methyl hippuric acid (MHA) levels were divided by the personal exposure concentrations of ethyl benzene and xylene, respectively. Mean (SE) corrected MA and MHA concentrations in the first week were 1.07 (0.18) and 2.66 (0.68) (mg/g creatinine)/(mg/m3), and concentrations in the second week were 0.50 (0.12) and 1.76 (0.35) (mg/g creatinine)/(mg/m3) in the second week, respectively. Both MA and MHA concentrations in the second week (when spray painters wore protective suits and gloves) were lower than in the first week, respectively (p<0.001, p = 0.011). Mean decrease in MA and MHA biomarkers were 69% and 49%, respectively.
This study successfully evaluated the effectiveness of chemical protective suits and gloves by using biomarkers as urinary MA and MHA. This method is feasible for determining the performance of workers wearing personal protective equipment. Moreover, the experimental results suggest that dermal exposure may be the major contributor to total body burden of solvents in spray painters without protective suits and gloves.
通过生物监测确定防护服和手套的有效性。
对一家船舶涂料厂的15名男性喷漆工进行了为期两周的研究。第一周工人未穿防护服,第二周穿戴防护服和手套。每周在连续四个工作日进行采样。使用3M 3500有机蒸汽监测仪采集空气中的乙苯和二甲苯。在每个工作班次前后收集尿液。
尿中扁桃酸(MA)和甲基马尿酸(MHA)水平分别除以乙苯和二甲苯的个人暴露浓度。第一周平均(标准误)校正后的MA和MHA浓度分别为1.07(0.18)和2.66(0.68)(毫克/克肌酐)/(毫克/立方米),第二周浓度分别为0.50(0.12)和1.76(0.35)(毫克/克肌酐)/(毫克/立方米)。第二周(喷漆工穿戴防护服和手套时)MA和MHA浓度均分别低于第一周(p<0.001,p = 0.011)。MA和MHA生物标志物的平均下降率分别为69%和49%。
本研究通过使用尿MA和MHA作为生物标志物成功评估了化学防护服和手套的有效性。该方法对于确定穿戴个人防护装备的工人的防护性能是可行的。此外,实验结果表明,在未穿防护服和手套的喷漆工中,皮肤暴露可能是溶剂全身负荷的主要来源。