Suppr超能文献

接受钙拮抗剂治疗的糖尿病高血压患者的护理质量和可归因医疗保健费用。

Quality of care and attributable healthcare costs in diabetic hypertensive patients initiated on calcium antagonist therapy.

机构信息

HealthCore Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, USA.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(11):641-9. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424110-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Calcium antagonists (CAs) from two classes - dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine (DCAs and NDCAs, respectively) - are important add-on agents in goal blood pressure (BP) attainment. This study compared drug regimens to which DCAs or NDCAs had been added; for each class, BP reduction and healthcare costs were evaluated in a diabetic hypertensive population.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: This was a retrospective observational study using administrative claims data within two US health plans. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension initiated on CA therapy between 1 January 2000 through 30 June 2002 were identified; the date the first CA prescription (CA-Rx) was filled in this period was labelled the index date. Inclusion required plan enrolment for 6 months pre- and 1 year post-index, no CA-Rx 6 months pre-index, and medication possession ratio >50% for 1 year post-index. Patients fell into either dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine study groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

For each group, costs (amounts allowed by plans, in US dollars; actual costs for 2000-2002) were calculated for resources attributable to DM/hypertension. A total of 5551 patients met eligibility criteria (NDCA = 1515; DCA = 4036). Most had been taking other antihypertensive medications: 86% and 76% in the DCA and NDCA groups, respectively. The NDCA group had lower annual attributable costs than the DCA group ($US1637 [95% CI $US1479, $US1813] vs $US1989 [95% CI $US1823, $US2170]; p < 0.004). A total of 313 medical charts were reviewed (DCA = 242, NDCA = 71). Both groups had similar pre-and post-index BP values; mean changes in systolic and diastolic BP were not statistically significant between groups. Only 22% of all patients attained the recommended systolic/diastolic BP goal of <130/80mm Hg, and <45% of patients were tested for proteinuria during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initiated on an NDCA attained similar BP reductions compared with DCA at lower total healthcare costs. Opportunities exist for more aggressive management of BP and testing for proteinuria in DM patients with hypertension.

摘要

背景与目的

二氢吡啶类(DHP)和非二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂(DCAs 和 NDCAs)分别为两类重要的附加降压药物,可用于目标血压(BP)达标。本研究对比了添加 DCA 或 NDCAs 的药物治疗方案,在糖尿病高血压人群中评估了两类药物的降压效果和医疗成本。

设计、设置和患者:本研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,使用了美国两个健康计划的行政索赔数据。2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2002 年 6 月 30 日期间,接受钙拮抗剂(CA)治疗的糖尿病(DM)合并高血压患者被识别出来;在此期间首次开具 CA 处方(CA-Rx)的日期被标记为索引日期。纳入标准为入组前 6 个月和入组后 1 年有计划覆盖,索引前 6 个月无 CA-Rx,入组后 1 年药物利用率(MPR)>50%。患者归入二氢吡啶或非二氢吡啶研究组。

主要观察指标和结果

对于每个组,都计算了与 DM/高血压相关的资源的费用(计划支付额,以美元计;2000-2002 年的实际费用)。共有 5551 名患者符合入选标准(NDCAs=1515 人;DCAs=4036 人)。大多数患者正在服用其他降压药物:DCA 组和 NDCAs 组分别为 86%和 76%。NDCAs 组的年归因费用低于 DCA 组($US1637 [95%CI:$US1479,$US1813] 比 $US1989 [95%CI:$US1823,$US2170];p<0.004)。共审查了 313 份病历(DCA=242,NDCAs=71)。两组患者的基线和随访 BP 值相似;组间收缩压和舒张压的平均变化无统计学意义。所有患者中仅有 22%达到了<130/80mmHg 的推荐收缩压/舒张压目标,<45%的患者在研究期间进行了蛋白尿检查。

结论

起始应用 NDCAs 的患者与 DCA 相比,BP 降幅相似,但总医疗成本更低。对于合并高血压的糖尿病患者,存在加强血压管理和蛋白尿检测的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验