Suppr超能文献

大麻检查:促进矛盾心理的大麻使用者做出改变。

The Marijuana Check-up: promoting change in ambivalent marijuana users.

作者信息

Stephens Robert S, Roffman Roger A, Fearer Stephanie A, Williams Carl, Burke Randy S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Virginia 24061, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2007 Jun;102(6):947-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01821.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of a two-session assessment and feedback intervention designed to reach and increase motivation for change in marijuana users who were experiencing negative consequences but were ambivalent about change.

DESIGN

Random assignment to one of two types of feedback conditions or a delayed feedback control (DFC) with follow-up assessments at 7 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Setting University of Washington research center in Seattle, Washington.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 188 adult male and female marijuana users who responded to advertisements. Interventions A personalized feedback (PF) condition utilizing motivational interviewing was compared to an educational control condition labeled multi-media feedback (MMF).

MEASUREMENTS

Marijuana use, dependence symptoms, other associated negative consequences and motivational constructs were assessed at all time-points.

FINDINGS

PF participants reported fewer days of use per week, fewer periods of use per day and fewer dependence symptoms at 7 weeks than those in the MMF and DFC conditions. PF participants also reported fewer days of use per week compared to MMF participants at the 12-month follow-up and fewer dependence symptoms at both the 6- and 12-month follow-ups compared to MMF participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The PF intervention, delivered in the context of a check-up, shows potential as a way of reaching and motivating change in marijuana users with a diagnosable disorder who otherwise are not ready to approach treatment. Ways of augmenting the modest absolute levels of change are discussed.

摘要

目的

评估一种分两阶段进行的评估与反馈干预措施的效果,该措施旨在接触那些正在经历负面后果但对改变持矛盾态度的大麻使用者,并增强他们改变的动力。

设计

随机分配到两种反馈条件之一或延迟反馈对照组(DFC),并在7周、6个月和12个月进行随访评估。地点为华盛顿州西雅图市的华盛顿大学研究中心。

参与者

共有188名回应广告的成年男性和女性大麻使用者。干预措施将采用动机性访谈的个性化反馈(PF)条件与标记为多媒体反馈(MMF)的教育对照组条件进行比较。

测量

在所有时间点评估大麻使用情况、依赖症状、其他相关负面后果和动机结构。

研究结果

与MMF和DFC条件组相比,PF组参与者在7周时报告每周使用天数更少、每天使用时段更少且依赖症状更少。在12个月随访时,与MMF组参与者相比,PF组参与者报告的每周使用天数也更少;在6个月和12个月随访时,与MMF组参与者相比,PF组参与者的依赖症状更少。

结论

在体检背景下实施的PF干预措施显示出潜力,可作为一种接触并激励患有可诊断疾病、但尚未准备好接受治疗的大麻使用者改变的方法。文中还讨论了增强适度绝对改变水平的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验