• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及公众参与:英国国民医疗服务体系的下一步走向?

Patient and public involvement: what next for the NHS?

作者信息

Hogg Christine N L

机构信息

London Metropolitan University, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00427.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00427.x
PMID:17524006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060383/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient and public involvement is the cornerstone of the 'patient-led' National Health Service (NHS). Though the UK has had state sponsored arrangements for patient and public involvement since 1974, they have become fragmented and unstable. Patients' forums and the Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health replaced community health councils (CHCs) and their national association in England in 2003, but now will be replaced by local involvement networks (LINks) and the Commission will be abolished in 2007.

LEARNING FROM HISTORY

This study provides an overview of research on the effectiveness of arrangements for patient and public involvement and reviews the debates about accountability, independence, ensuring consistency of performance, representation and how arrangements for the NHS fit within the wider agenda of citizenship and renewal of democracy. It explores key themes and areas for learning to inform the debate about how LINks might work effectively to improve the health of local people, in particular addressing issues of equity, representation and citizen engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed LINks provide the opportunity to integrate patient and public involvement into wider initiatives for local democracy and citizen engagement. But debates and key issues about user and public involvement in the 1970s remain current and unresolved. If the new LINks are to succeed where forums and CHCs are considered to have failed, the strengths and weakness of both need to be understood and addressed.

摘要

引言

患者及公众参与是“患者主导”的国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的基石。自1974年以来,英国就有政府资助的患者及公众参与安排,但这些安排已变得零散且不稳定。患者论坛以及患者与公众健康参与委员会于2003年取代了英格兰的社区健康委员会(CHCs)及其全国性协会,但现在它们将被地方参与网络(LINks)取代,该委员会将于2007年被废除。

从历史中学习

本研究概述了关于患者及公众参与安排有效性的研究,并回顾了有关问责制、独立性、确保绩效一致性、代表性以及NHS的安排如何适应更广泛的公民身份和民主更新议程的辩论。它探讨了关键主题和可供借鉴的领域,以为关于LINks如何有效运作以改善当地居民健康的辩论提供信息,特别是解决公平、代表性和公民参与等问题。

结论

提议的LINks提供了将患者及公众参与纳入更广泛的地方民主和公民参与倡议的机会。但20世纪70年代关于用户及公众参与的辩论和关键问题仍然存在且未得到解决。如果新的LINks要在被认为论坛和CHCs已失败的方面取得成功,就需要理解并解决两者的优势与劣势。

相似文献

1
Patient and public involvement: what next for the NHS?患者及公众参与:英国国民医疗服务体系的下一步走向?
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00427.x.
2
How patient involvement in care is improving service provision.患者参与护理如何改善服务提供。
Nurs Times. 2004;100(17):33-5.
3
Public involvement: working for better health.公众参与:为改善健康而努力。
Nurs Stand. 1999;14(1):46-52. doi: 10.7748/ns1999.09.14.1.46.c2682.
4
Integrity, ambiguity or duplicity? NHS consultation with the public.诚信、含糊还是表里不一?英国国家医疗服务体系与公众的咨询。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1998 Nov;11(4):201-10. doi: 10.1177/095148489801100401.
5
Awareness and practice of complementary therapies in hospital and community settings within Essex in the United Kingdom.英国埃塞克斯郡医院及社区环境中辅助疗法的认知与实践
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 May;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.08.005.
6
Involving users in service planning: a focus group approach.让用户参与服务规划:焦点小组方法。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Sep;10(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
7
Community involvement in hospital governance in Britain: evidence from before the National Health Service.英国社区参与医院管理:国民医疗服务体系建立之前的证据
Int J Health Serv. 2008;38(4):751-71. doi: 10.2190/HS.38.4.j.
8
Customers and contractors in the new NHS.新国民医疗服务体系中的客户与承包商。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(5):45-8. doi: 10.1108/09526869610125046.
9
User involvement in UK cancer services: bridging the policy gap.英国癌症服务中的患者参与:弥合政策差距。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2003 Dec;12(4):331-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00431.x.
10
Involvement of patients in Clinical Governance.患者参与临床治理。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):699-703. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.121.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion in public involvement: A conceptual review.公众参与中的情感:概念性综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14020. doi: 10.1111/hex.14020.
2
Public governance of medical artificial intelligence research in the UK: an integrated multi-scale model.英国医学人工智能研究的公共治理:一种综合多尺度模型。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 May 21;8(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00357-7.
3
'We go where we know': Reflections from Mobilizing for PrEP and Sexual Health (MobPrESH) - A peer-led PrEP education programme across England, for and by women and non-binary people.“我们去我们了解的地方”:动员人们接受 PrEP 和性健康(Mobilizing for PrEP and Sexual Health,简称 MobPrESH)的反思 - 这是一个在英格兰由女性和非二元性别者主导的 PrEP 教育项目。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221091727. doi: 10.1177/17455057221091727.
4
If I was minister of health: democratising healthcare.如果我是卫生部长:实现医疗保健的民主化。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Mar;114(3):140-145. doi: 10.1177/0141076821992442. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Enabling 'citizen voice' in the English health and social care system: A national survey of the organizational structures, relationships and impacts of local Healthwatch in England.在英国卫生和社会保健系统中启用“公民之声”:对英格兰地方 Healthwatch 的组织结构、关系和影响的全国调查。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1108-1117. doi: 10.1111/hex.13086. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
6
Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships.患者和公众参与英格兰国民保健制度转型中的优先事项设定决策:对南伦敦可持续性转型伙伴关系中的临床委托组进行的访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1223-1230. doi: 10.1111/hex.12948. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
8
Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.通过跨学科团队在初级保健中实施社区参与:爱尔兰的实践案例研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):990-1001. doi: 10.1111/hex.12692. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions.女性对无创产前检测伦理影响的观点:一项为健康政策决策提供信息的定性分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 16;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0267-4.
10
Patient Involvement in Geriatric Care - Results and Experiences from a Mixed Models Design Study within Project INTEGRATE.患者参与老年护理——综合项目中混合模型设计研究的结果与经验
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Feb 28;18(1):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2517.