• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为埋藏学因素的啮齿动物:褐家鼠和灰松鼠对骨头的啃咬

Rodents as taphonomic agents: bone gnawing by brown rats and gray squirrels.

作者信息

Klippel Walter E, Synstelien Jennifer A

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, South Stadium Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jul;52(4):765-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00467.x. Epub 2007 May 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00467.x
PMID:17524050
Abstract

Passive infrared technology was used to film diurnal and nocturnal scavenging behavior of brown rats and gray squirrels at the University of Tennessee's Anthropological Research Facility. This direct documentation demonstrated that brown rats modified fat-laden cancellous bone while gray squirrels generally gnawed the thicker bone cortices only after fats had leached away. A case study placed in a shaded portion of the Facility indicated the postmortem interval for initial gnawing by gray squirrels was slightly over 30 months. An examination of 53 human skeletons in the William M. Bass Forensic Skeletal Collection revealed that 10 cases had gnaw marks consistent with those made by gray squirrels. One of the 10 cases had been gnawed within 16 months of time-since-death, while the remaining nine had postmortem intervals >30 months. Additional observed modifications made to nonhuman bone by gray squirrels indicate that squirrel gnaw marks on bone can serve as a minimal estimate of time-since-death in a temperate environment similar to that of East Tennessee.

摘要

田纳西大学的人类学研究设施使用被动红外技术拍摄了褐家鼠和灰松鼠的昼夜觅食行为。这一直接记录表明,褐家鼠会啃食富含脂肪的松质骨,而灰松鼠通常只在脂肪渗出后才啃咬较厚的骨皮质。在该设施阴凉处进行的一项案例研究表明,灰松鼠开始啃咬的死后间隔时间略超过30个月。对威廉·M·巴斯法医骨骼收藏中的53具人类骨骼进行检查后发现,有10例有与灰松鼠啃咬痕迹相符的咬痕。这10例中有1例在死后16个月内被啃咬,其余9例的死后间隔时间超过30个月。灰松鼠对非人类骨骼造成的其他观察到的改变表明,在与东田纳西州类似的温带环境中,松鼠在骨头上留下的咬痕可作为死后时间的最低估计。

相似文献

1
Rodents as taphonomic agents: bone gnawing by brown rats and gray squirrels.作为埋藏学因素的啮齿动物:褐家鼠和灰松鼠对骨头的啃咬
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jul;52(4):765-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00467.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
2
Cadaver use at the University of Tennessee's Anthropological Research Facility.田纳西大学人类学研究机构的尸体使用情况。
Clin Anat. 2011 Apr;24(3):372-80. doi: 10.1002/ca.21154.
3
Forensic implications of carnivore scavenging on human remains recovered from outdoor locations in Greece.食肉动物对从希腊户外地点发现的人类遗骸进行 scavenging 的法医学意义。 注:scavenging 常见释义为“食腐” ,这里根据语境可能是指食肉动物对人类遗骸的啃食、破坏等行为,在没有更多背景信息的情况下,直接保留英文更准确传达原文意思,若结合具体语境,可根据实际情况灵活翻译。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 Aug;17(6):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
White-tailed Deer as a Taphonomic Agent: Photographic Evidence of White-tailed Deer Gnawing on Human Bone.白尾鹿作为一种埋藏学因素:白尾鹿啃食人类骨骼的摄影证据。
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Jan;63(1):292-294. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13514. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Taphonomic changes to blunt force trauma: a preliminary study.钝器伤的埋藏学变化:一项初步研究。
J Forensic Sci. 2007 May;52(3):519-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00405.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
6
A new method for determination of postmortem interval: citrate content of bone.一种确定死亡时间间隔的新方法:骨中柠檬酸盐含量
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Nov;55(6):1516-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01511.x.
7
Skeletal manifestations of bear scavenging.
J Forensic Sci. 2000 May;45(3):515-26.
8
Estimating the timing of long bone fractures: correlation between the postmortem interval, bone moisture content, and blunt force trauma fracture characteristics*.估计长骨骨折的时间:死后间隔时间、骨含水量与钝器伤骨折特征之间的相关性*
J Forensic Sci. 2008 Sep;53(5):1028-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00801.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
9
Differentiation of perimortem and postmortem trauma using taphonomic indicators.利用埋藏学指标区分濒死期创伤和死后创伤。
J Forensic Sci. 1995 May;40(3):509-12.
10
Factors affecting postmortem tooth loss.影响死后牙齿脱落的因素。
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Nov;49(6):1313-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional significance and welfare implications of chewing in dogs ().犬类咀嚼的功能意义及对福利的影响()。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 26;12:1499933. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1499933. eCollection 2025.
2
Human Decomposition and Time Since Death: Persistent Challenges and Future Directions of Postmortem Interval Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.人类尸体分解与死亡时间:法医人类学中死后间隔时间估计的持续挑战与未来方向
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2024 Dec;186 Suppl 78(Suppl 78):e70011. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.70011.
3
Post-Mortem Dental Profile as a Powerful Tool in Animal Forensic Investigations-A Review.
死后牙齿特征作为动物法医调查中的有力工具——综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;12(16):2038. doi: 10.3390/ani12162038.
4
Uncovering Forensic Taphonomic Agents: Animal Scavenging in the European Context.揭示法医埋藏学因素:欧洲背景下的动物 scavenging(此处“scavenging”可译为“食腐行为” )
Biology (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;11(4):601. doi: 10.3390/biology11040601.
5
Decomposition of dinosaurian remains inferred by invertebrate traces on vertebrate bone reveal new insights into Late Jurassic ecology, decay, and climate in western Colorado.通过脊椎动物骨骼上的无脊椎动物痕迹推断恐龙遗骸的分解,为科罗拉多州西部晚侏罗世的生态、腐烂和气候提供了新的见解。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 15;8:e9510. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9510. eCollection 2020.
6
The impact of scavenging: perspective from casework in forensic anthropology.scavenging的影响:法医人类学案例工作的视角
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Feb 9;5(1):32-37. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704473. eCollection 2020.
7
Collagen degradation as a possibility to determine the post-mortem interval (PMI) of animal bones: a validation study referring to an original study of Boaks et al. (2014).胶原蛋白降解作为确定动物骨骼死后间隔时间(PMI)的一种可能性:一项参考Boaks等人(2014年)原始研究的验证研究
Int J Legal Med. 2018 May;132(3):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1747-7. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
8
Personal identification of cold case remains through combined contribution from anthropological, mtDNA, and bomb-pulse dating analyses.通过人类学、线粒体DNA和炸弹脉冲测年分析的综合贡献对悬案遗体进行个人身份鉴定。
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Sep;57(5):1354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02223.x. Epub 2012 Jul 16.