Perrin Felicity M R, Lipman Marc C I, McHugh Timothy D, Gillespie Stephen H
Centre of Medical Microbiology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;7(7):481-90. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70112-3.
Global initiatives have been launched to develop improved tuberculosis chemotherapy. New drugs and potential treatment-shortening regimens require careful assessment in clinical trials, but existing markers of treatment outcome-clinical cure and relapse-require prolonged follow-up of patients. There is, therefore, a need to find alternative biomarkers or surrogate endpoints predictive of response. Effective treatment requires drugs with sterilising activity to produce clinical cure without relapse, and thus a useful biomarker for a drug under trial must predict the likelihood of relapse. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of existing biomarkers, which assess either host response or mycobacterial load. Change in mycobacterial burden is likely to be the best indicator of treatment outcome, but the optimum study techniques remain undefined. Finally, we propose methods to assess candidate markers, and how these candidate markers could be implemented in future clinical trials.
全球已发起多项倡议来研发改进的结核病化疗方法。新药和可能缩短治疗疗程的方案需要在临床试验中进行仔细评估,但现有的治疗结果标志物——临床治愈和复发——需要对患者进行长期随访。因此,有必要寻找能够预测反应的替代生物标志物或替代终点。有效的治疗需要具有杀菌活性的药物来实现临床治愈且不复发,因此,正在试验的药物的一个有用生物标志物必须能够预测复发的可能性。我们探讨了现有生物标志物的优缺点,这些生物标志物评估的是宿主反应或分枝杆菌载量。分枝杆菌负担的变化可能是治疗结果的最佳指标,但最佳的研究技术仍未明确。最后,我们提出了评估候选标志物的方法,以及这些候选标志物如何在未来的临床试验中得以应用。