Schmidt Lutz G, Smolka Michael N
Department of Psychiatry, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2007 May-Jun;42(3):241-6. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agm027.
To assess the role of smoking on treatment outcome in quitting alcoholics on the background of the priming or coping hypothesis (Rohsenow et al., 1997).
Data sets of placebo treated patients of the German phase III trial of naltrexone (Gastpar et al., 2002) and of acamprosate treated patients of a German phase IV trial Soyka et al., 2002) were reanalyzed. Differences between smoking and non-smoking alcoholics were evaluated using chi(2)-, t- or ANOVA-tests, relapse rates using survival techniques with Cox regression.
Smoking alcoholics differed significantly from non-smoking alcoholics regarding sociodemographic variables (e.g. more males, more often living alone) and severity indicators of alcoholism (e.g. quantity, onset, related problems). In the naltrexone study time to first relapse was significantly longer for smoking alcoholics compared to non-smoking alcoholics (hazard ratio = 2.26; P = 0.036). The same effect was seen in the acamprosate study (hazard ratio = 1.34; P = 0.015); estimated abstinence-rates after 24 weeks were 38% for smoking alcoholics compared to 28% for non-smoking alcoholics (P < 0.015).
Smoking was significantly associated with better outcome in recovering alcoholics included in two pharmacotherapy trials. Although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear our findings are in favour of the coping hypothesis. The results challenge the validity of the dependence syndrome.
在启动或应对假说(罗森纳等人,1997年)的背景下,评估吸烟对戒酒者治疗结果的作用。
对纳曲酮德国III期试验(加斯帕尔等人,2002年)中接受安慰剂治疗患者的数据集以及丙戊酸德国IV期试验(索伊卡等人,2002年)中接受丙戊酸治疗患者的数据集进行重新分析。使用卡方检验、t检验或方差分析评估吸烟和不吸烟的酗酒者之间的差异,使用Cox回归生存技术评估复发率。
在社会人口统计学变量(如男性更多、更常独居)和酗酒严重程度指标(如饮酒量、开始时间、相关问题)方面,吸烟的酗酒者与不吸烟的酗酒者存在显著差异。在纳曲酮研究中,吸烟的酗酒者首次复发的时间明显长于不吸烟的酗酒者(风险比=2.26;P=0.036)。在丙戊酸研究中也观察到了同样的效果(风险比=1.34;P=0.015);24周后,吸烟的酗酒者估计戒酒率为38%,而不吸烟的酗酒者为28%(P<0.015)。
在两项药物治疗试验中,吸烟与康复酗酒者的更好治疗结果显著相关。尽管潜在机制尚不清楚,但我们的研究结果支持应对假说。这些结果对依赖综合征的有效性提出了挑战。