Suppr超能文献

科学家、生物伦理与民主:意大利案例及其意义。

Scientists, bioethics and democracy: the Italian case and its meanings.

作者信息

Corbellini Gilberto

机构信息

Sezione di Storia della Medicina, Università la Sapienza Roma, Viale dell'Università 34/a, 00185 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):349-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.020586.

Abstract

In June 2005, Italy held a referendum on repealing the law on medically assisted fertilization (Law 40/2004), which limits access to artificial reproduction to infertile couples, and prohibits the donation of gametes, the cryopreservation of embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PDG), and research on human embryos. The referendum was invalidated, and the law remained unchanged. The Italian political e bioethical debate on assisted reproduction was manipulated by the Catholic Church, which distorted scientific data and issues at stake with the help of Catholic politicians and bioethicists. What happened in Italy shows that some perverse socio-cultural e political mechanisms are spreading the absurd and anti-historical view that scientific and technological advancements are threatening democracy and personal freedom. Scientists should not only contrast the political attempts at limiting freedom of scientific research, but also tell politicians, humanists and citizens that the invention of Western science with its view of scientific community as an "open society", contributed and still contributes, through scientific education, to the construction and maintaining of the moral and political values underlying Western democracies.

摘要

2005年6月,意大利就废除辅助生殖法(第40/2004号法律)举行全民公投。该法律将人工生殖的适用范围限制在不孕夫妇,并禁止配子捐赠、胚胎冷冻保存、植入前基因诊断(PGD)以及人类胚胎研究。全民公投被宣布无效,法律维持不变。意大利关于辅助生殖的政治和生物伦理辩论受到天主教会的操纵,天主教会在天主教政治家和生物伦理学家的帮助下歪曲了科学数据和利害关系。意大利发生的事情表明,一些不良的社会文化和政治机制正在传播一种荒谬且反历史的观点,即科技进步正在威胁民主和个人自由。科学家不仅应抵制限制科研自由的政治企图,还应告知政治家、人文主义者和公民,西方科学的发明及其将科学界视为“开放社会”的观点,通过科学教育,过去和现在都为西方民主所基于的道德和政治价值观的构建与维护做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Scientists, bioethics and democracy: the Italian case and its meanings.
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):349-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.020586.
2
Regulating assisted reproduction in Italy: a 5-year assessment.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Jun;12(2):81-8. doi: 10.1080/14647270902849719.
3
Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction.
Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1153-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh871. Epub 2005 Mar 24.
4
From biopolitics to bioethics: church, state, medicine and assisted reproductive technology in Ireland.
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Sep;28(6):817-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00544.x.
5
Science, democracy, and the right to research.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):351-66. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9135-4. Epub 2009 May 12.
7
Precommitment analysis and societal moral identity.
Tex Law Rev. 2003 Jun;81(7):1877-927.
8
Protecting embryos and burdening women: assisted reproduction in Italy.
Hum Reprod. 2004 Aug;19(8):1693-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh326. Epub 2004 Jun 30.
10
Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 23;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0324-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study among Italian physiotherapists.
Arch Physiother. 2025 Feb 13;15:19-31. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3299. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Open science and human genetic data: recommendations on South Africa's .
Front Genet. 2023 Oct 2;14:1248747. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1248747. eCollection 2023.
3
Stakeholder Involvement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing in Japan.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):431-455. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00251-8. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
A survey of Italian physicians' opinion about stem cells research: what doctors prefer and what the law requires.
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:480304. doi: 10.1155/2014/480304. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
5
Science under politics. An Italian nightmare.
EMBO Rep. 2011 Jan;12(1):19-22. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.198. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验