Suppr超能文献

普通肥皂洗手未能防止患者细菌经手传播至尿道导管。

Failure of bland soap handwash to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters.

作者信息

Ehrenkranz N J, Alfonso B C

机构信息

Florida Consortium for Infection Control, South Miami.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Nov;12(11):654-62. doi: 10.1086/646261.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study was designed to compare the efficacies of bland soap handwash and isopropyl alcohol hand rinse in preventing transfer of aerobic gram-negative bacilli to urinary catheters via transient hand colonization acquired from direct patient contact. Glove juice recovery of gram-negative bacteria was considered transient colonization; catheter recovery was considered transfer colonization.

DESIGN

The contact source for gram-negative bacteria was a single "high burden" groin skin carrier (greater than or equal to 10(4)/ml cup scrub fluid). Using a two-period cross-over design, 6 healthcare workers had 2 15-second contacts for each hand followed by either soap handwash or alcohol hand rinse (12 experiments with each treatment). Between 4 to 5 minutes after contact, each hand manipulated a catheter; the catheter was then cultured and the hand was glove juice tested.

RESULTS

Soap handwash failed to prevent gram-negative bacteria transfer to the catheter in 11 of 12 (92%) experiments; alcohol hand rinse in 2 of 12 (17%) (p less than .001). Soap handwash failed to prevent transient colonization in 12 of 12 (100%) experiments; alcohol in 5 of 12 (42%) (risk ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.7). Single gram-negative bacteria species carried at source levels greater than or equal to 5.5 x 10(3)/ml (heavy contamination) established transient colonization in 23 of 30 (77%) exposures following soap handwash; single gram-negative bacteria species carried at levels less than or equal to 3.5 x 10(3)/ml established colonization in 1 of 22 (5%) similar exposures (p less than .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bland soap handwash was generally ineffective in preventing hand transfer of gram-negative bacteria to catheters following brief contact with a heavy-contamination patient source; alcohol hand rinse was generally effective.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较普通肥皂洗手和异丙醇擦手在预防因直接接触患者而导致的需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌通过手部短暂定植转移至导尿管方面的效果。革兰氏阴性菌的手套液回收被视为短暂定植;导尿管回收被视为转移定植。

设计

革兰氏阴性菌的接触源为单一“高负荷”腹股沟皮肤携带者(杯状擦洗液中细菌数量大于或等于10⁴/ml)。采用两阶段交叉设计,6名医护人员每只手进行2次15秒的接触,之后进行肥皂洗手或酒精擦手(每种处理进行12次实验)。接触后4至5分钟,每只手操作一根导尿管;然后对导尿管进行培养,并对手部进行手套液检测。

结果

在12次实验中的11次(92%)中,肥皂洗手未能防止革兰氏阴性菌转移至导尿管;酒精擦手在12次实验中的2次(17%)出现这种情况(p<0.001)。在12次实验中的12次(100%)中,肥皂洗手未能防止短暂定植;酒精擦手在12次实验中的5次(42%)出现这种情况(风险比2.4,95%置信区间1.2 - 4.7)。源水平大于或等于5.5×10³/ml(重度污染)的单一革兰氏阴性菌在肥皂洗手后的30次暴露中有23次(77%)导致短暂定植;源水平小于或等于3.5×10³/ml的单一革兰氏阴性菌在22次类似暴露中有1次(5%)导致定植(p<0.001)。

结论

与重度污染的患者源短暂接触后,普通肥皂洗手通常无法有效防止革兰氏阴性菌从手部转移至导尿管;酒精擦手通常有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验