Durant Sarah M, Bashir Sultana, Maddox Thomas, Laurenson M Karen
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW14RY, United Kingdom.
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):602-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00702.x.
Although detailed, long-term scientific studies provide potentially crucial information for conservation, they are rare. Moreover, there is often a disjunction between scientists and managers that can affect whether scientific results are applied to help solve conservation problems. Long-term studies can promote increased communication between scientists and managers and hence offer an opportunity for constructive engagement between the two groups. We examined direct and indirect impacts of a 30-year study, the Serengeti Cheetah Project (SCP). Much of what is currently known about wild cheetahs comes from the SCP. In particular, the SCP has demonstrated that cheetahs have a combination of semisociality and ranging patterns that is unique among mammals. This system arises because cheetahs need to be mobile to avoid predators and competitors, yet maintain access to prey; this results in densities much lower than for other large carnivores and a requirement for large areas of heterogenous and connected habitat. The SCP started as a research project, but expanded into a national program, developing capacity for carnivore conservation within Tanzania. Long-term studies such as the SCP are uniquely placed to establish effective working relationships between scientists and managers, engage local and national institutions, and strengthen national capacity for biodiversity conservation. This process is best realized through the establishment of frameworks for conservation that seek to align scientific research with management needs. Long-term studies also play an important role in identifying international priorities for conservation. Nonetheless, the integration of science and management in conservation is a two-way process that requires concerted efforts by both sides to improve and maintain dialogue. Ultimately, conservation depends on people, and maintaining a commitment to a particular area over many years-such as through implementation of a long-term research project-helps establish mutual trust and respect, particularly when combined with development of local and national capacity for scientific research and conservation management.
尽管详细的长期科学研究能为保护工作提供潜在的关键信息,但此类研究却很罕见。此外,科学家与管理者之间往往存在脱节,这可能会影响科学研究成果能否应用于解决保护问题。长期研究能够促进科学家与管理者之间加强交流,从而为双方进行建设性互动提供契机。我们考察了一项为期30年的研究——塞伦盖蒂猎豹项目(SCP)的直接和间接影响。目前关于野生猎豹的许多认知都来自SCP。特别是,SCP已证明猎豹具有半社会性和活动模式的某种组合,这在哺乳动物中是独一无二的。这种体系的出现是因为猎豹需要保持移动以躲避捕食者和竞争者,同时又要能获取猎物;这导致其种群密度远低于其他大型食肉动物,并且需要大面积的异质且相连的栖息地。SCP起初是一个研究项目,但后来扩展为一项国家计划,提升了坦桑尼亚境内食肉动物保护的能力。像SCP这样的长期研究在建立科学家与管理者之间有效的工作关系、促使地方和国家机构参与以及加强国家生物多样性保护能力方面具有独特优势。这个过程最好通过建立旨在使科学研究与管理需求相契合的保护框架来实现。长期研究在确定国际保护重点方面也发挥着重要作用。尽管如此,保护工作中科学与管理的整合是一个双向过程,需要双方共同努力来改进和维持对话。归根结底,保护工作依赖于人,多年来对特定领域保持专注——比如通过实施一个长期研究项目——有助于建立相互信任和尊重,尤其是在与地方和国家科研及保护管理能力的发展相结合时。