Brassine Eléanor, Parker Daniel
Wildlife and Reserve Management Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0142508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142508. eCollection 2015.
Camera trapping studies have become increasingly popular to produce population estimates of individually recognisable mammals. Yet, monitoring techniques for rare species which occur at extremely low densities are lacking. Additionally, species which have unpredictable movements may make obtaining reliable population estimates challenging due to low detectability. Our study explores the effectiveness of intensive camera trapping for estimating cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) numbers. Using both a more traditional, systematic grid approach and pre-determined, targeted sites for camera placement, the cheetah population of the Northern Tuli Game Reserve, Botswana was sampled between December 2012 and October 2013. Placement of cameras in a regular grid pattern yielded very few (n = 9) cheetah images and these were insufficient to estimate cheetah density. However, pre-selected cheetah scent-marking posts provided 53 images of seven adult cheetahs (0.61 ± 0.18 cheetahs/100 km²). While increasing the length of the camera trapping survey from 90 to 130 days increased the total number of cheetah images obtained (from 53 to 200), no new individuals were recorded and the estimated population density remained stable. Thus, our study demonstrates that targeted camera placement (irrespective of survey duration) is necessary for reliably assessing cheetah densities where populations are naturally very low or dominated by transient individuals. Significantly our approach can easily be applied to other rare predator species.
相机陷阱研究在估算个体可识别的哺乳动物种群数量方面越来越受欢迎。然而,针对密度极低的珍稀物种的监测技术却很缺乏。此外,对于那些行动不可预测的物种,由于可探测性低,要获得可靠的种群数量估计可能具有挑战性。我们的研究探讨了密集相机陷阱在估算猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)数量方面的有效性。在2012年12月至2013年10月期间,我们采用了更传统的系统网格方法以及预先确定的相机放置目标地点,对博茨瓦纳北部图利野生动物保护区的猎豹种群进行了采样。以规则网格模式放置相机仅获得了很少(n = 9)的猎豹图像,这些图像不足以估算猎豹密度。然而,预先选定的猎豹气味标记点提供了7只成年猎豹的53张图像(0.61 ± 0.18只猎豹/100平方公里)。虽然将相机陷阱调查的时长从90天增加到130天增加了获得的猎豹图像总数(从53张增加到200张),但没有记录到新的个体,估计的种群密度保持稳定。因此,我们的研究表明,在种群数量自然非常低或由短暂个体主导的情况下,为可靠评估猎豹密度,有必要进行有针对性的相机放置(与调查时长无关)。重要的是,我们的方法可以很容易地应用于其他珍稀捕食者物种。