• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目击证人证词中的准确性-信心相关性:回顾性自我意识效应的局限与拓展

The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect.

作者信息

Kassin S M, Rigby S, Castillo S R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bronfman Science Center, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Nov;61(5):698-707. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.698.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.698
PMID:1753326
Abstract

This research extended Kassin's (1985) finding that retrospective self-awareness (RSA) increases the correlation between eyewitness accuracy and confidence. In Experiment 1, 91 mock witnesses saw a crime, answered questions, made an identification decision, and rated their confidence. RSA increased the accuracy-confidence correlation for witnesses who made an identification and for those who were high but not low in public self-consciousness. A 2nd experiment varied accountability and revealed that high accountability increased the accuracy-confidence correlation but that the RSA effect occurred even under low-accountability conditions. In both studies, observers could not distinguish between accurate and inaccurate witnesses. Together, these findings define the limits of the RSA effect and provide mixed support for a self-perception account of this effect.

摘要

本研究扩展了卡辛(1985年)的研究发现,即回顾性自我意识(RSA)会增强目击者准确性与信心之间的相关性。在实验1中,91名模拟目击者观看了一起犯罪事件,回答问题,做出身份识别决定,并对自己的信心进行评分。RSA提高了做出身份识别的目击者以及公众自我意识高而非低的目击者的准确性-信心相关性。第二个实验改变了问责程度,结果显示高问责性增加了准确性-信心相关性,但即使在低问责条件下RSA效应依然存在。在两项研究中,观察者都无法区分准确和不准确的目击者。这些发现共同界定了RSA效应的局限性,并为这种效应的自我认知解释提供了混合支持。

相似文献

1
The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect.目击证人证词中的准确性-信心相关性:回顾性自我意识效应的局限与拓展
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Nov;61(5):698-707. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.698.
2
Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.调查调查人员:审视目击证人指认证据对学生调查人员的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):439-53. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9125-5. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
3
The effect of cross-examination style questions on adult eyewitness accuracy depends on question type and eyewitness confidence.交叉讯问方式对成人目击证人准确性的影响取决于问题类型和目击证人的信心。
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):163-178. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2129066. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
4
Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?事后辨认反馈是否会影响目击者证词和辨认程序的评估?
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Aug;34(4):282-94. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9189-5. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
5
Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence.
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Jun;82(3):416-25. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.416.
6
Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations.目击证人的准确性与信心:个体内部与个体之间的相关性。
J Appl Psychol. 1989 Apr;74(2):356-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.356.
7
The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.目击证人信心与识别准确性之间的关系:新综合。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 May;18(1):10-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100616686966. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Actual vs. perceived eyewitness accuracy and confidence and the featural justification effect.实际与感知的目击证人准确性、信心及特征性理由效应。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Dec;24(4):543-563. doi: 10.1037/xap0000182. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Public eyewitness confidence ratings can differ from those held privately.公众目击者的信心评级可能与私下持有的评级有所不同。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Apr;25(2):141-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1005641314083.
10
Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements.背景会影响对目击证人信心陈述的解读。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Apr;41(2):180-190. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000216. Epub 2016 Sep 5.