Gupta Pravin J
Gupta Nursing Home, Laxminagar, Nagpur 440022, India.
World J Surg. 2007 Jul;31(7):1480-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9096-1.
Sitz bath is frequently recommended by physicians for a variety of anal disorders including anal fissure. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sitz bath does have any therapeutic properties improving upon a patient's postoperative symptoms after a closed lateral sphincterotomy.
Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive analgesics and fiber supplement alone (control patients) or a twice-daily sitz bath along with identical fiber and analgesics (sitz bath group). A 24-h pain score--post-defecation anal burning and symptom improvement--was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS).
The groups were equally matched for age, gender distribution, and duration of disease. No significant difference in mean pain score between groups (p = 0.284) was noticed after one week. However, the patients from the control group experienced significant anal burning compared with patients from sitz bath group (p < 0.0001). The improvement score was higher in the sitz bath group when compared with the control group; however, it did not reached a statistically significant level.
Patients after sphincterotomy for anal fissure receiving sitz bath experienced similar levels of pain when compared with those not receiving sitz bath. However, they reported a significant relief in anal burning and a marginally better satisfaction score and no reported adverse side effects.
坐浴是医生针对包括肛裂在内的多种肛门疾病经常推荐的治疗方法。本研究的目的是确定坐浴对于接受外侧括约肌切开术后患者的术后症状是否具有改善的治疗作用。
46例患者被随机分为两组,一组仅接受镇痛药和纤维补充剂治疗(对照组),另一组除接受相同的纤维补充剂和镇痛药外,还每天坐浴两次(坐浴组)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估24小时疼痛评分、排便后肛门灼痛情况及症状改善情况。
两组在年龄、性别分布和病程方面匹配良好。一周后,两组之间的平均疼痛评分无显著差异(p = 0.284)。然而,与坐浴组患者相比,对照组患者出现了明显的肛门灼痛(p < 0.0001)。坐浴组的改善评分高于对照组;然而,未达到统计学显著水平。
与未接受坐浴的肛裂括约肌切开术后患者相比,接受坐浴的患者疼痛程度相似。然而,他们报告肛门灼痛明显减轻,满意度评分略高,且未报告有不良副作用。