Triaging and coding ophthalmic emergency: the Rome Eye Scoring System for Urgency and Emergency (RESCUE): a pilot study of 1,000 eye-dedicated emergency room patients.

PURPOSE

Ophthalmic emergency (OE) triage is essential for prompt recognition of urgent cases. To date, no formal eye-dedicated triaging system has been widely accepted. The purpose of the present study is to propose a fast, accurate, and reproducible coding scale called the Rome Eye System for Scoring Urgency and Emergency (Rescue).

METHODS

Phase 1 of the study is a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (EMR); phase 2 is a prospective consecutive series. Phase 1 included 160,936 patients. Phase 2 included 1000 consecutive patients referred to the emergency department (ED) of our institution. In phase 1, the authors retrospectively analyzed EMRs of patients presenting to the ED, listing signs and symptoms most frequently associated with hospitalization. Redness, pain, loss of vision, and the risk for an open eye were identified and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 12. Color coding was assigned based on increasing scoring: 0-3 white, 4-7 green, 8-12 yellow code. In phase 2, 1000 consecutive ED patients were enrolled and prospectively coded according to RESCUE. After diagnosis and proper treatment, EMRs were retrospectively reviewed by a masked physician and patients recoded (Retro coding) according to clinical course. Correlation between Rescue and Retro coding was calculated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prospective and retrospective ED color coding correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 160,936 EMR were retrospectively analyzed; 2407 (1.4%) patients required hospitalization. Loss of vision (90%), redness (76%), and pain (47%) were the most frequent complaints. Rescue significantly correlated to Retro coding (p<0.01): 841/1000 patients coded exactly the same color, 45/1000 were overestimated by one color class, none by two, 107/1000 underestimated by one, and 6/1000 by two classes. The 32/1000 hospitalized patients in the prospective cohort had a Rescue score significantly higher than non-admitted patients (p<0.01) and color coding among admitted and dismissed patients was significantly different as well (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Rescue system seems promising in terms of usefulness and ease of implementation. The high correlation between Rescue code assigned prospectively and the post-diagnosis coding, as well as the prompt discrimination of cases that eventually required hospitalization, may lead to a wider use of the Rescue system. Further testing on larger samples and different institutions is warranted.