• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼科急诊就诊特征及护士与眼科医生的分诊差异:来自中国南方一家眼科中心的视角

Characteristics of eye-related emergency visits and triage differences by nurses and ophthalmologists: Perspective from a single eye center in southern China.

作者信息

Chen Juan, Chen Chen-Mei, Zheng Yongxin, Zhong Liuxueying

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 16;10:1091128. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1091128. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1091128
PMID:37007786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10061012/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe characteristics of eye-related emergency department (ED) visits and investigate differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and ophthalmologists.

METHODS

A prospective survey was conducted at the ED of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center from January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2021. Clinical data from patients with acute ophthalmic conditions lasting less than 7 days were collected a standard questionnaire and the urgency levels assigned by nurses and physicians were also recorded. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify characteristics associated with truly emergency conditions and up- or down-triage.

RESULTS

A total of 1907 patients were enrolled, with 582 (30.5%) classified as "non-emergency." Red eye (69.7%), eye pain (53.0%), ocular trauma (44.1%), tearing (43.6%), and blurred vision (43.1%) were the most common complaints. Truly emergency tended to be male (OR 2.019,  < 0.001) and with unilateral eye involvement (OR 2.992,  < 0.001). Nurses prioritized conjunctival, scleral, closed ocular trauma and eyelid diseases over doctors while giving less priority to open ocular trauma, cornea, uveitis, and vitreoretinal diseases ( < 0.05). Overemphasis on mild blurred vision (OR 3.718,  = 0.001) and insufficient understanding of conjunctival diseases without red eye (OR 0.254,  = 0.001) were associated with conjunctival disease "up-triage." Insufficient awareness of moderate and severe blurred vision was associated with "down-triage" for ocular trauma (OR 3.475,  = 0.001 and OR 2.422,  = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ophthalmic EDs are typically flooded with patients suffering from acute ocular problems, with a considerable portion for non-emergency conditions. The identification of characteristics associated with truly emergency cases and nurses' triage preferences is valuable in providing target guidance for future ED practice and facilitating the proper allocation of emergency resources.

摘要

目的

描述眼科急诊就诊的特征,并调查分诊护士和眼科医生对患者优先级分配的差异。

方法

于2021年1月1日至2021年5月31日在中山大学中山眼科中心急诊科进行前瞻性调查。收集急性眼科疾病持续时间少于7天的患者的临床资料,采用标准问卷,并记录护士和医生分配的紧急程度。进行二元逻辑回归分析,以确定与真正紧急情况及分诊上调或下调相关的特征。

结果

共纳入1907例患者,其中582例(30.5%)被归类为“非紧急情况”。眼红(69.7%)、眼痛(53.0%)、眼外伤(44.1%)、流泪(43.6%)和视力模糊(43.1%)是最常见的主诉。真正的紧急情况往往为男性(比值比[OR]2.019,P<0.001)且单眼受累(OR 2.992,P<0.001)。护士对结膜、巩膜、闭合性眼外伤和眼睑疾病的优先级高于医生,而对开放性眼外伤、角膜、葡萄膜炎和玻璃体视网膜疾病的优先级较低(P<0.05)。对轻度视力模糊的过度重视(OR 3.718,P=0.001)以及对无眼红的结膜疾病认识不足(OR 0.254,P=0.001)与结膜疾病“分诊上调”相关。对中度和重度视力模糊认识不足与眼外伤“分诊下调”相关(分别为OR 3.475,P=0.001和OR 2.422,P=0.020)。

结论

眼科急诊科通常挤满了患有急性眼部问题的患者,其中相当一部分为非紧急情况。识别与真正紧急病例相关的特征以及护士的分诊偏好,对于为未来急诊科实践提供目标指导和促进紧急资源的合理分配具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/10061012/a28cd951d781/fmed-10-1091128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/10061012/a28cd951d781/fmed-10-1091128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/10061012/a28cd951d781/fmed-10-1091128-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of eye-related emergency visits and triage differences by nurses and ophthalmologists: Perspective from a single eye center in southern China.眼科急诊就诊特征及护士与眼科医生的分诊差异:来自中国南方一家眼科中心的视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 16;10:1091128. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1091128. eCollection 2023.
2
Corrigendum: Characteristics of eye-related emergency visits and triage differences by nurses and ophthalmologists: perspective from a single eye center in southern China.勘误:眼科急诊就诊特征及护士与眼科医生的分诊差异:来自中国南方一家眼科中心的视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 12;10:1241114. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241114. eCollection 2023.
3
Enhancing Ophthalmic Triage: identification of new clinical features to support healthcare professionals in triage.增强眼科分诊能力:识别新的临床特征,以支持医护人员进行分诊。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Sep;38(13):2536-2544. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03070-9. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Validity of an Ocular Emergency Triage System Compared to the Existing Grading System at the Emergency Unit of a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级眼科医院急诊科的眼部紧急分诊系统与现有分级系统的有效性比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 8;17:527-534. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S397504. eCollection 2023.
5
Triaging and coding ophthalmic emergency: the Rome Eye Scoring System for Urgency and Emergency (RESCUE): a pilot study of 1,000 eye-dedicated emergency room patients.眼科急诊的分诊与编码:用于紧急情况的罗马眼部分级系统(RESCUE):对1000名眼科急诊室患者的初步研究。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):413-7. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700324.
6
Differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and by consultant physicians in accident and emergency departments.急诊部门分诊护士和会诊医生对患者的优先级分配差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Aug;47(4):312-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.4.312.
7
Agreement between triage category and patient's perception of priority in emergency departments.急诊科分诊类别与患者对优先顺序的认知之间的一致性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Oct 18;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0316-2.
8
Reliability and validity of the four-level Chinese emergency triage scale in mainland China: A multicenter assessment.中国大陆四级中文急救分诊量表的信度和效度:一项多中心评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jan;101:103447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103447. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
Effectiveness of a telemedicine program for triage and diagnosis of emergent ophthalmic conditions.远程医疗项目在眼科急症分诊和诊断中的有效性。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb;37(2):325-331. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01940-8. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
10
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Awareness of Ocular Chemical Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lithuania.立陶宛公众对眼部化学伤的认知:一项横断面研究
Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 13;15(2):35. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15020035.
2
Characteristics of ocular-related emergency department visits: Five-years data from a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.眼部相关急诊就诊特点:沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级护理中心五年数据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 11;19(11):e0310179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310179. eCollection 2024.
3
The profile of patients attending to the general emergency department with ocular complaints within the last year: is it a true ocular emergency?

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, management, and outcome of infection, sepsis, and septic shock in a German emergency department (EpiSEP study).德国急诊科感染、脓毒症及感染性休克的流行病学、管理与结局(EpiSEP研究)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 17;9:997992. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.997992. eCollection 2022.
2
The epidemiology of eye injuries in Western Australia: a retrospective 10-year study.澳大利亚西部眼部外伤的流行病学:一项回顾性 10 年研究。
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Aug;106(6):633-639. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2111198. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
Association of the Affordable Care Act with Eye-Related Emergency Department Utilization in the United States.
在过去一年中,因眼部主诉就诊于综合急诊的患者特征:这是真正的眼部急症吗?
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03608-1.
平价医疗法案与美国眼部相关急诊就诊率的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2022 Dec;129(12):1412-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.038. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
4
Diagnostic Correlation between General Practitioners and the Ophthalmologist in the Management of Eye Diseases.全科医生与眼科医生在眼病管理中的诊断相关性。
West Afr J Med. 2022 Jun 24;39(6):563-567.
5
Patient disposition using the Emergency Severity Index: a retrospective observational study at an interdisciplinary emergency department.运用急诊严重指数对患者进行分类:在一家多学科急诊中心的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 12;12(5):e057684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057684.
6
Characterization of ophthalmic presentations to emergency departments in the United States: 2010-2018.美国急诊眼科就诊特征:2010-2018 年。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;54:279-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.024. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Epidemiology of welding-associated ocular injuries.焊接相关眼部损伤的流行病学。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;54:15-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.030. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
8
Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the Canadian triage and acuity scale.护士、儿科住院医师和急诊住院医师使用加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表的儿科分诊差异。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00541-0.
9
The Manchester Triage System's performance in clinical risk prioritisation of patients presenting with headache in emergency department: A retrospective observational study.《曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科头痛患者临床风险分层中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究》
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Sep;31(17-18):2553-2561. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16073. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
What about the others: differential diagnosis of COVID-19 in a German emergency department.其他方面:德国急诊科 COVID-19 的鉴别诊断。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 17;21(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06663-x.