Gustavsson E, Andersson M, Stephanson N, Beck O
Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Mass Spectrom. 2007 Jul;42(7):881-9. doi: 10.1002/jms.1219.
A method based on the direct injection of diluted urine for the identification and quantification of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide, codeine, codeine-6-glucuronide, ethylmorphine, ethylmorphine-6-glucuronide and 6-acetylmorphine (6AM) in human urine by electrospray ionisation liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was validated for use as a confirmation procedure in urine drug testing. Four deuterium labelled analogues were used as internal standards: morphine-3-glucuronide-D3, morphine-D3, codeine-D3 and 6AM-D3. Twenty microlitre aliquots of urine were mixed with 80 mul of the internal standard solution in autosampler vials and 10 mul was injected. The chromatographic system consisted of a 2.0 x 100 mm C18 column and the gradient elution buffers used acetonitrile and 25 mmol/l formic acid. Two product ions produced from the protonated molecular ions were monitored in the selected reaction monitoring mode. The intra- and inter-assay variability (coefficient of variation) was below 10% at higher levels for all analytes, but at the reporting limits the variation was above 20% for 6AM, morphine-3-glucuronide and codeine-6-glucuronide. Ion suppression occurred early after injection but did not affect the identification and quantification of the analytes in authentic samples. The method was further validated by comparison with a reference gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method using authentic urine samples. The two methods agreed almost completely (99%) regarding the identified analytes, but for the quantitative results there were slightly lower levels when measuring glucuronides directly as compared to total determination after hydrolysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We conclude that the presented liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method is robust and reliable, and suitable for use as a confirmation method in urine drug testing for opiates
一种基于直接注射稀释尿液的方法,通过电喷雾电离液相色谱 - 串联质谱法对人尿中吗啡、吗啡 - 3 - 葡糖醛酸苷、吗啡 - 6 - 葡糖醛酸苷、可待因、可待因 - 6 - 葡糖醛酸苷、乙基吗啡、乙基吗啡 - 6 - 葡糖醛酸苷和6 - 乙酰吗啡(6AM)进行鉴定和定量,该方法经验证可作为尿液药物检测中的确证程序。使用四种氘代标记类似物作为内标:吗啡 - 3 - 葡糖醛酸苷 - D3、吗啡 - D3、可待因 - D3和6AM - D3。在自动进样瓶中将20微升尿液等分试样与80微升内标溶液混合,进样10微升。色谱系统由一根2.0×100毫米的C18柱组成,梯度洗脱缓冲液使用乙腈和25毫摩尔/升甲酸。在选择反应监测模式下监测质子化分子离子产生的两个产物离子。所有分析物在较高水平时批内和批间变异(变异系数)均低于10%,但在报告限处,6AM、吗啡 - 3 - 葡糖醛酸苷和可待因 - 6 - 葡糖醛酸苷的变异高于20%。注射后早期出现离子抑制,但不影响真实样品中分析物的鉴定和定量。通过与使用真实尿液样品的参考气相色谱 - 质谱法比较,进一步验证了该方法。两种方法在已鉴定的分析物方面几乎完全一致(99%),但对于定量结果,与气相色谱 - 质谱法水解后总测定相比,直接测量葡糖醛酸苷时水平略低。我们得出结论,所提出的液相色谱 - 串联质谱法稳健可靠,适用于作为阿片类药物尿液药物检测的确证方法