Suppr超能文献

肌内注射双氯芬酸与口服布洛芬或尼美舒利在门诊环境中退热的比较。

Intramuscular Dipyrone versus Oral Ibuprofen or Nimesulide for Reduction of Fever in the Outpatient Setting.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Medical Faculty of Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(8):519-26. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323080-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and rate of temperature reduction of three antipyretic medications in febrile children.

DESIGN

A single-dose, randomised, prospective, modified double-blind, parallel clinical trial.

SETTING

The paediatric emergency department of a university hospital that has 13 000 annual visits.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

252 otherwise healthy children aged 6 months to 14 years with acute, intercurrent, febrile illness.

INTERVENTIONS

Enrolled children were assigned to receive a single dose of oral ibuprofen 10 mg/kg, oral nimesulide 2.5 mg/kg, or parenteral dipyrone 10 mg/kg.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Axillary temperature was measured at the time of antipyretic administration and at 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes thereafter. All three medications were effective in reducing the axillary temperature during the 2-hour testing period. The rates of axillary temperature change between the three medications were significantly different for the ibuprofen and dipyrone groups (p = 0.023). In addition, the axillary temperature in the dipyrone group was significantly lower than that in the ibuprofen group (p = 0.036) at 120 minutes. There was no significant difference in antipyretic effect between the nimesulide group and the other two groups during the testing period. Within each group the difference between initial temperature and the temperature at the end of the testing period was statistically significant (p = 0.036) for the dipyrone group only.

CONCLUSIONS

All three antipyretic medications were effective in reducing the axillary temperature in febrile children. Although administration of intramuscular dipyrone seemed to be more effective than ibuprofen, this relationship was not significant when nimesulide was considered. In addition, in view of its known side effects and the problems associated with intramuscular administration in children, the preference for orally administered nimesulide or ibuprofen over dipyrone in the setting of the emergency department seems more logical provided that the child accepts oral therapy.

摘要

目的

比较三种解热药在发热儿童中的疗效和降温速度。

设计

单剂量、随机、前瞻性、改良双盲、平行临床试验。

地点

拥有 13000 名年就诊量的大学医院儿科急诊。

研究对象

252 名患有急性、一过性、发热性疾病的 6 个月至 14 岁健康儿童。

干预措施

入选儿童接受单剂量口服布洛芬 10mg/kg、口服尼美舒利 2.5mg/kg 或肌内注射赖氨匹林 10mg/kg。

主要观察指标及结果

在解热治疗时及之后 30、45、60 和 120 分钟测量腋温。三种药物在 2 小时测试期间均有效降低腋温。布洛芬和赖氨匹林组之间的腋温变化率差异有统计学意义(p=0.023)。此外,120 分钟时赖氨匹林组的腋温明显低于布洛芬组(p=0.036)。在测试期间,尼美舒利组与其他两组的解热效果无显著差异。在每组中,仅赖氨匹林组的初始温度与测试期末温度之间的差异有统计学意义(p=0.036)。

结论

三种解热药均能有效降低发热儿童的腋温。虽然肌内注射赖氨匹林似乎比布洛芬更有效,但当考虑尼美舒利时,这种关系并不显著。此外,鉴于其已知的副作用和儿童肌内注射相关问题,如果儿童接受口服治疗,那么在急诊环境中,尼美舒利或布洛芬的口服给药似乎比赖氨匹林更合理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验