Suppr超能文献

口服双氯芬酸(美洛昔康)与口服布洛芬在发热儿童中的解热作用比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Antipyretic effect of oral dipyrone (Metamizole) compared to oral ibuprofen in febrile children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Malaya University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Research Department, Al-Rassoul Al-Aazam hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05095-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone (Metamizole) is a potent pain reliever and fever reducer with muscle relaxant properties, most commonly used as an analgesic and antipyretic agent. Despite the fact that it has been banned in many high-income countries following confirmed studies of fatal agranulocytosis and adverse drug reactions, it is still widely used in various countries of the world. However, the antipyretic therapeutic indications of dipyrone in febrile children are currently unknown, and there is little information on the advantages and disadvantages of using dipyrone in febrile children. In febrile children, we expected that dipyrone's antipyretic effectiveness wouldn't be any more effective than ibuprofen. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of oral dipyrone and oral ibuprofen as antipyretics in febrile children.

METHODS

Several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched thoroughly using a pre-established search strategy for potential research. The studies included in this analysis comprised randomized controlled trials that compared the antipyretic effects of oral ibuprofen and oral dipyrone in febrile children. Data analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Three studies were selected among the 27 publications we discovered to be applicable, and they underwent qualitative and quantitative analysis. The pooled analysis revealed no discernible difference between oral dipyrone and oral ibuprofen in terms of their antipyretic effects (Mean difference (MD) = 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.08, 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Both oral dipyrone and ibuprofen are effective in reducing high-temperature levels in febrile children without any significant difference.

摘要

背景

双氯芬酸(Metamizole)是一种强效的止痛和退热药物,具有肌肉松弛作用,最常用于作为镇痛药和退热剂。尽管已有研究证实其会导致致命性粒细胞减少症和药物不良反应,但在许多高收入国家已被禁用,但它在世界上许多国家仍被广泛使用。然而,双氯芬酸在发热儿童中的退热治疗指征目前尚不清楚,并且关于在发热儿童中使用双氯芬酸的优缺点的信息也很少。在发热儿童中,我们预计双氯芬酸的退热效果不会比布洛芬更有效。因此,本研究的目的是评估口服双氯芬酸和布洛芬作为退热剂在发热儿童中的疗效。

方法

我们使用预先制定的搜索策略,对包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 在内的多个数据库进行了全面搜索,以寻找潜在的研究。本分析纳入的研究为比较口服布洛芬和口服双氯芬酸在发热儿童中的退热效果的随机对照试验。数据分析使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行。

结果

在我们发现的 27 篇适用文献中,有 3 篇研究被选中进行定性和定量分析。汇总分析显示,口服双氯芬酸和布洛芬在退热效果方面没有明显差异(Mean difference (MD) = 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.08, 0.20)。

结论

口服双氯芬酸和布洛芬在降低发热儿童的高温水平方面均有效,且无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ba6/11451230/f4e2db3849d7/12887_2024_5095_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验