• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助安德森-海因斯肾盂成形术:一个中心的5年经验

Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.

作者信息

Schwentner Christian, Pelzer Alexandre, Neururer Richard, Springer Brigitte, Horninger Wolfgang, Bartsch Georg, Peschel Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x. Epub 2007 May 29.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x
PMID:17535275
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present our 5-year experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), as LP has been shown to have similar success rates as open surgery, but standard LP requires high operative skills and a correspondingly long period of training, limiting its widespread availability, and RALP is easier and quicker to learn due to facilitated intracorporeal suturing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 92 patients had transperitoneal RALP for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) using the daVinci system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). A transperitoneal dismembered Anderson-Hynes procedure was used in all cases. Three robotic ports and one assistant port were used in all cases while a JJ stent was left indwelling for 6 weeks. Both primary PUJO (including horseshoe kidneys in 80 cases) and secondary (in 12 cases) were considered eligible. The follow-up included ultrasonography, excretory urography and renal scintigraphy.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 39.1 months; PUJO was successfully resolved in 89 patients (96.7%) while three required additional procedures. Haemorrhage into the collecting system and urine extravasation occurring early after surgery were the causes of failure. The mean (range) operative duration, including the set-up of the robot, was 108.34 (72-215) min; the mean duration of docking and surgery significantly decreased with experience (P < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 4.57 days. Split renal function improved from 37.6% to 41.9%. No cases of secondary PUJO were recorded during extended follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

RALP using the daVinci system is safe and effective, achieving similar long-term success rates to open surgery. The three-dimensional versatility of the robot enables the surgeon to recapitulate the open procedure. The results were durable with no cases of late complications, corroborating the accuracy of robot-assisted intracorporeal suturing and the subsequent quality of the pelvi-ureteric anastomosis. Moreover, the robotic approach was easy and quick to learn for both the surgical and the technical staff. Therefore, RALP is our preferred technique to treat PUJO.

摘要

目的

介绍我们在机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)方面的5年经验,因为腹腔镜肾盂成形术(LP)已被证明与开放手术成功率相似,但标准的LP需要较高的手术技巧和相应较长的培训时间,限制了其广泛应用,而由于体内缝合更容易且更快掌握,RALP更容易学习。

患者与方法

总共92例患者使用达芬奇系统(美国加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔市直观外科公司)经腹膜进行RALP治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(PUJO)。所有病例均采用经腹膜离断性安德森-海恩斯手术。所有病例均使用3个机器人端口和1个辅助端口,同时留置双J支架6周。原发性PUJO(包括80例马蹄肾)和继发性PUJO(12例)均被视为符合条件。随访包括超声检查、排泄性尿路造影和肾闪烁显像。

结果

平均随访39.1个月;89例患者(96.7%)的PUJO成功解决,3例需要额外手术。手术早期发生的集合系统出血和尿液外渗是失败的原因。包括机器人设置在内的平均手术时间为108.34(72 - 215)分钟;随着经验的增加,对接和手术的平均时间显著缩短(P < 0.001)。平均住院时间为4.57天。分肾功能从37.6%提高到41.9%。在延长随访期间未记录到继发性PUJO病例。

结论

使用达芬奇系统的RALP安全有效,长期成功率与开放手术相似。机器人的三维多功能性使外科医生能够重现开放手术过程。结果持久,无晚期并发症病例,证实了机器人辅助体内缝合的准确性以及随后肾盂输尿管吻合的质量。此外,机器人手术方法对外科医生和技术人员来说都容易且快速掌握。因此,RALP是我们治疗PUJO的首选技术。

相似文献

1
Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.机器人辅助安德森-海因斯肾盂成形术:一个中心的5年经验
BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x. Epub 2007 May 29.
2
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.腹腔镜机器人辅助治疗马蹄肾患者肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:技术与1年随访
BJU Int. 2006 Mar;97(3):579-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05967.x.
3
Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery.机器人腹腔镜手术同时治疗肾结石和肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻
BJU Int. 2005 Dec;96(9):1365-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05819.x.
4
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.我们对腹膜后和经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的经验。
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
5
Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience.机器人肾盂成形术的疗效分析:一项大型单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(7):980-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08983.x. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
6
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:钬激光与气压弹道碎石清石效果的比较
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
7
Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:技术与结果的跨大西洋比较。
BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1113-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06739.x.
8
The retroperitoneal laparoscopic Hellström technique for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction from a crossing vessel.用于治疗由交叉血管导致的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腹膜后腹腔镜Hellström技术
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1335-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07131.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
9
Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.机器人技术在继发性肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻管理中的作用
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Jan;60(1):9-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00701.x.
10
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO):技术考虑和结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Early post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty in patients with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction.机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗单侧输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻患者的术后早期结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Aug;56(8):2607-2613. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04010-y. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
Salvage minimally invasive robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: a systematic review.成人挽救性微创机器人辅助和腹腔镜肾盂成形术:一项系统评价
Arab J Urol. 2022 Jun 28;20(4):204-211. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2082208. eCollection 2022.
3
The robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in adult: A narrative review on the surgical techniques and contemporary outcomes.
成人机器人辅助输尿管重建:手术技术与当代疗效的叙述性综述
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A retrospective case series review.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):202-207. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_10_20.
5
Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era.无模拟器学习机器人肾盂成形术:机器人时代早期学习曲线的评估。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e777. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e777. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population.儿科人群中的机器人输尿管重建术
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 22;7:85. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00085. eCollection 2019.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with horseshoe kidneys: results of a multicentric study.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)治疗马蹄肾患儿:一项多中心研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10):2257-2263. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02632-x. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
Complex pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): successful management with robotic assistance.复杂型肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(PUJO):机器人辅助下的成功治疗
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):121-127. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0829-y. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single-centre experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4590-4596. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6212-2. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: vascular anatomic variations and implication for surgical approaches.与交叉血管相关的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:血管解剖变异及其对手术方式的影响
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Mar;50(3):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1771-z. Epub 2018 Jan 4.