Seetharam Bhat Kulthe Ramesh, Moschovas Marcio Covas, Patel Vipul R, Ko Young Hwii
Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Department of Urology, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Despite the rapid increase in the use of robotic surgery in urology, the majority of ureteric reconstruction procedures are still performed using laparoscopic or open approaches. This is primarily due to uncertainty regarding the advantages of robotic approaches over conventional ones, and the unique difficulty in identifying the specific area of interest due to the lack of tactile feedback from the current robotic systems. However, with the potential benefits of minimal invasiveness, several pioneering reports have been published on robotic surgery in urology. By reviewing the literature on this topic, we aimed to summarize the techniques, considerations, and consistent findings regarding robotic ureteral reconstruction in adults. Robotic applications for ureteral surgery have been primarily reported for pediatric urology, especially in the context of relieving a congenital obstruction in the ureteral pelvic junction. However, contemporary studies have also consistently demonstrated that robotic surgery could be a reliable option for malignant, iatrogenic, and traumatic conditions, which generally occur in adult patients. Nevertheless, the lack of comparative studies on heterogeneous hosts and disease conditions make it difficult to determine the benefit of the robotic approach over the conventional approach in the general population; thus, qualified prospective trials are needed for wider acceptance. However, contemporary reports have demonstrated that the robotic approach could be an alternative option for ureteral construction, even in the absence of haptic feedback, which can be compensated by various surgical techniques and enhanced three-dimensional visualization.
尽管泌尿外科机器人手术的使用迅速增加,但大多数输尿管重建手术仍采用腹腔镜或开放手术方式。这主要是由于机器人手术方法相对于传统方法的优势尚不确定,以及由于当前机器人系统缺乏触觉反馈,难以确定特定的感兴趣区域。然而,鉴于微创性的潜在益处,已有几篇关于泌尿外科机器人手术的开创性报告发表。通过回顾该主题的文献,我们旨在总结成人机器人输尿管重建的技术、注意事项和一致的研究结果。输尿管手术的机器人应用主要报道于小儿泌尿外科,尤其是在解除输尿管肾盂连接处先天性梗阻的情况下。然而,当代研究也一致表明,机器人手术对于通常发生在成年患者中的恶性、医源性和创伤性疾病可能是一种可靠的选择。尽管如此,由于缺乏针对不同宿主和疾病状况的比较研究,难以确定机器人手术方法相对于传统手术方法在普通人群中的益处;因此,需要进行合格的前瞻性试验以获得更广泛的认可。然而,当代报告表明,即使没有触觉反馈,机器人手术方法也可能是输尿管重建的一种替代选择,这可以通过各种手术技术和增强的三维可视化来弥补。